对阿富汗建设项目延误的根本原因进行混合方法调查
Mohammad Basheer Ahmadzai1,2, Kunhui Ye1
1School of Management Science and Real Estate, Chongqing University, 83# Shabei Street, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400045, China.
Heliyon
|February 5, 2025
概括
阿富汗建设项目延迟,影响79%的项目,主要是由于安全挑战,腐败和物流. 解决这些问题对于国家发展和基础设施改善至关重要.
科学领域:
- 建设管理建设管理.
- 发展研究 发展研究 研究
- 安全研究 安全研究
背景情况:
- 由于建筑项目的延迟普遍存在,阿富汗面临着关键基础设施缺口,79%的项目遭遇挫折.
- 这些延迟严重阻碍了国家发展,并造成了巨大的经济损失.
研究的目的:
- 调查阿富汗建设项目延误的根本原因.
- 分析这些延迟对项目成果的影响,并确定缓解策略.
- 将阿富汗的挑战与其他受冲突影响的国家进行比较.
主要方法:
- 从五个主要利益相关者群体收集观点:客户,顾问,承包商,项目经理和讲师.
- 与乌克兰,巴基斯坦,巴勒斯坦和伊拉克等受冲突影响的国家进行比较分析.
- 专注于对与安全相关的延误原因进行新的检查和排名.
主要成果:
- 安全挑战,腐败和后勤障碍被确定为阿富汗建设项目延误的重要驱动因素.
- 该研究强调了冲突地区建筑项目所面临的独特和共同的挑战.
- 与安全相关的延误原因被明确审查,进步了对这个尚未探索的领域的理解.
结论:
- 量身定制的战略对于缓解导致阿富汗建设项目延误的多方面的问题至关重要.
- 通过有针对性的干预措施,可以实现项目成果的改善和建筑行业业绩的提升.
- 这项研究为决策者,从业者和研究人员提供了有价值的见解,以应对阿富汗和类似环境中的建筑挑战.
相关概念视频
01:14Design Example: Managing Concrete Workability
69
This example deals with managing the workability of concrete for a raft foundation project under hot weather conditions. Workability is crucial for ensuring the concrete is easy to place, compact, and finish. In this scenario, a slump test — a common method to measure the workability of fresh concrete — initially indicated low workability. This was attributed to the rapid water loss from the concrete mix, exacerbated by the high temperatures causing the course aggregates to heat up.
69
01:25Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
81
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
81
02:01Factorial Design
13.0K
Factorial Analysis is an experimental design that applies Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistical procedures to examine a change in a dependent variable due to more than one independent variable, also known as factors. Changes in worker productivity can be reasoned, for example, to be influenced by salary and other conditions, such as skill level. One way to test this hypothesis is by categorizing salary into three levels (low, moderate, and high) and skills sets into two levels (entry level...
13.0K
01:17Design Example: Alignment of a Road Line Using GIS
38
The alignment of a road line using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) is a critical process in civil engineering, combining advanced technology with practical decision-making. This methodology begins with the collection of geospatial data, including information on land cover, geomorphology, drainage patterns, slope, and contour details. Such data is typically acquired through satellite imagery and GIS tools, offering a comprehensive understanding of the terrain.Once the data is gathered, it...
38
01:19Design Example: Maintaining Level of an Embankment
51
Constructing a roadway embankment over uneven terrain requires precise leveling to ensure stability and proper drainage. Surveyors use a leveling instrument and staff to calculate ground elevations and determine the required fill material at each point along the embankment alignment.The process begins by positioning a leveling instrument near a benchmark with a known elevation. A backsight reading establishes the instrument height, which serves as a reference for subsequent measurements. A...
51
01:17Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors
59
A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...
59