相关实验视频

Updated: May 1, 2026

Making Sense of Listening: The IMAP Test Battery

Making Sense of Listening: The IMAP Test Battery

Published on: October 11, 2010

用不同的方法测量噪音对儿童倾听力度的影响:系统性审查和元分析

Gudambe Nellithaya Spoorthi¹, Ajith Kumar Uppunda², Mohan Kumar Kalaiah¹

¹Department of Audiology and Speech Language Pathology, Kasturba Medical College Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Karnataka, Manipal, 576104, India.

European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

|February 8, 2025

概括

噪音显著增加了5至13岁儿童的听力. 主观评分和单任务行为方法有效地测量了这一点,而不是双任务或学生计. 结合方法提供了宝贵的见解.

科学领域:

听觉感知研究听觉感知研究
儿童发展研究儿童发展研究
语音和听力科学语音和听力科学

背景情况:

随着背景噪音的增加,听力增加,影响儿童和成年人.
了解和量化孩子的倾听力度对于学业成功至关重要.
本综述侧重于5至13岁的正常听力儿童.

研究的目的:

系统地审查和对噪音对儿童听力努力的影响进行元分析.
评估各种测量方法,以评估儿童群体的倾听力.
确定可靠的方法来评估噪音引起的听力.

主要方法:

在四个数据库 (PubMed,Scopus,Cochrane,Web of Science) 搜索了23篇符合条件的文章.
通过Joanna Briggs研究所的批判性评估清单评估研究质量.
对行为 (单任务,双任务),主观和生理 (pupillometry) 测量进行了元分析.

主要成果:

噪音通过单任务范式和主观评分对听力努力产生了显著的中等影响.
双任务范式和瞳孔测量没有产生统计学上显著的结果.
语音感知任务表明,噪音对听力效果的影响比听力理解任务更大.

结论:

单任务和主观评分方法有效地证明噪音对儿童 (5-13岁) 倾听力度的负面影响.
将这两种方法结合起来,可以提供关于噪音对这个年龄组的影响的全面数据.
方法异质性和构造有效性问题可能会解释各种发现.

关键词:

双重任务模式的范式倾听就是一个努力.瞳孔测量术 (pupillometry) 是指用眼睛测量一个孩子的眼睛.响应时间响应时间信号与噪声的比率.单一任务模式的范式.主观评级是一个主观的评级.系统性审查系统性审查

更多相关视频

Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses

Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses

Published on: January 23, 2017

Pupillometry to Assess Auditory Sensation in Guinea Pigs

Pupillometry to Assess Auditory Sensation in Guinea Pigs

Published on: January 6, 2023

相关概念视频

Echo

Echo

The human ear cannot distinguish between two sources of sound if they happen to reach within a specific time interval, typically 0.1 seconds apart. More than this, and they are perceived as separate sources.
Imagine the sound is reflected back to the ears. Assuming that the source is very close to the human, the difference between hearing the two sounds—the emitted sound and the reflected sound—may be more than the minimum time for perceiving distinct sounds. If this is the case,...