解决人口预测中的离散化诱导偏见问题
Evan Dong1, Aaron Schein2, Yixin Wang3
1Department of Computer Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
PNAS nexus
|February 10, 2025
概括
区分人口预测,比如种族/种族归因,导致显著的偏见,低估了少数群体. 一种新的联合优化方法消除了这种偏差,而不损失准确性,这对于公平的数据分析至关重要.
科学领域:
- 社会科学 社会科学 社会科学
- 计算机科学 计算机科学
- 政治科学 政治科学是指政治学.
背景情况:
- 人口统计对审计差异和政治准至关重要.
- 当前的方法往往使连续预测变得离散,导致潜在的偏差.
研究的目的:
- 调查在人口统计中对离散偏差现象的研究.
- 引入和评估一种用于减轻这种偏差的新方法.
主要方法:
- 使用现实世界的数据分析Argmax标签用于种族/种族归算.
- 开发和测试一个联合优化方法与数据驱动的值启发式.
主要成果:
- 阿尔格马克斯标签显著低于黑人选民 (例如,北卡罗来纳州的28.2%).
- 拟议的联合优化方法有效地消除了离散偏差.
- 使用新方法观察到可以忽略不计的个体级准确性损失.
结论:
- 人口归因中的分离偏差对下游应用有严重的影响.
- 校准连续模型本身无法解决这种偏差; 需要专门的方法.
- 研究人员和从业人员必须仔细考虑区分人口预测的后果.
更多相关视频
相关概念视频
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
81
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
81
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
139
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
139
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
130
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
130
Truncation in Survival Analysis
146
Truncation in survival analysis refers to the exclusion of individuals or events from the dataset based on specific criteria related to the time of the event. This exclusion can happen in two primary forms: left truncation and right truncation.
Left truncation occurs when individuals who experienced the event of interest before a certain time are not included in the study. This is often due to a "delayed entry" into the study where only those who survive until a certain entry point are...
Left truncation occurs when individuals who experienced the event of interest before a certain time are not included in the study. This is often due to a "delayed entry" into the study where only those who survive until a certain entry point are...
146
Estimating Population Standard Deviation
3.0K
When the population standard deviation is unknown and the sample size is large, the sample standard deviation s is commonly used as a point estimate of σ. However, it can sometimes under or overestimate the population standard deviation. To overcome this drawback, confidence intervals are determined to estimate population parameters and eliminate any calculation bias accurately. However, this only applies to random samples from normally distributed populations. Knowing the sample mean and...
3.0K
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation
7.6K
In practice, we rarely know the population standard deviation. In the past, when the sample size was large, this did not present a problem to statisticians. They used the sample standard deviation s as an estimate for σ and proceeded as before to calculate a confidence interval with close enough results. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the...
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the...
7.6K


