Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Confidence Coefficient01:24

Confidence Coefficient

7.5K
The confidence coefficient is also known as the confidence level or degree of confidence. It is the percent expression for the probability, 1-α, that the confidence interval contains the true population parameter assuming that the confidence interval is obtained after sufficient unbiased sampling; for example, if the CL = 90%, then in 90 out of 100 samples the interval estimate will enclose the true population parameter. Here α is the area under the curve, distributed equally under...
7.5K
Critical Values01:31

Critical Values

6.7K
A critical value is a definite value obtained from a particular probability distribution at a predecided confidence level (or a predecided significance level) for a given population parameter. The critical value provides demarcation that separates the sample statistics that are likely to occur from the ones that are unlikely to occur based on the given probability distribution and the population parameter to be estimated. The critical value for normal distribution is obtained from the z...
6.7K
Bonferroni Test01:10

Bonferroni Test

2.7K
The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
2.7K
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

6.0K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
6.0K
z Scores and Area Under the Curve01:17

z Scores and Area Under the Curve

10.4K
z scores are the standardized values obtained after converting a normal distribution into a standard normal distribution. A z score is measured in units of the standard deviation. The z score tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a z score of...
10.4K
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

3.2K
One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
3.2K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Exploring psychological tradeoffs: Developing and demonstrating an R Shiny app for Pareto optimization.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same author

Early Screening for Decoding- and Language-Related Reading Difficulties in First and Third Grades.

Assessment for effective intervention : official journal of the Council for Educational Diagnostic Services·2026
Same author

Adolescent Sexting in Romantic Relationships and Daily Positive and Negative Affect Dynamics: A Dyadic Intensive Longitudinal Study.

Computers in human behavior·2026
Same author

A primer on intensive longitudinal psychometrics.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same author

Dynamic measurement invariance cutoffs for longitudinal and dyadic data.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same author

Evidence-based practice attitude scale for Latinx mental health professionals: a novel application of confirmatory factor analysis.

Implementation science communications·2026

相关实验视频

Updated: May 28, 2025

The α-test: Rapid Cell-free CD4 Enumeration Using Whole Saliva
11:22

The α-test: Rapid Cell-free CD4 Enumeration Using Whole Saliva

Published on: May 16, 2012

13.8K

可靠性代表性:α系数如何总结得分分布中的可靠性?

Daniel McNeish1, Denis Dumas2

  • 1Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, PO Box 871104, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA. dmcneish@asu.edu.

Behavior research methods
|February 10, 2025
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

系数alpha提供了一个单一的可靠性得分,但可靠性可以在一个尺度上有所不同. 本研究介绍了将α系数与条件可靠性进行比较的方法,为得分精度提供了更清晰的理解.

关键词:
该系数为α系数.条件可靠性 有条件可靠性克伦巴赫的阿尔法欧米茄 欧米茄 欧米茄 欧米茄 是一个可靠性 可靠性可靠性

更多相关视频

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

670
Isokinetic Robotic Device to Improve Test-Retest and Inter-Rater Reliability for Stretch Reflex Measurements in Stroke Patients with Spasticity
08:40

Isokinetic Robotic Device to Improve Test-Retest and Inter-Rater Reliability for Stretch Reflex Measurements in Stroke Patients with Spasticity

Published on: June 12, 2019

7.4K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: May 28, 2025

The α-test: Rapid Cell-free CD4 Enumeration Using Whole Saliva
11:22

The α-test: Rapid Cell-free CD4 Enumeration Using Whole Saliva

Published on: May 16, 2012

13.8K
Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

670
Isokinetic Robotic Device to Improve Test-Retest and Inter-Rater Reliability for Stretch Reflex Measurements in Stroke Patients with Spasticity
08:40

Isokinetic Robotic Device to Improve Test-Retest and Inter-Rater Reliability for Stretch Reflex Measurements in Stroke Patients with Spasticity

Published on: June 12, 2019

7.4K

科学领域:

  • 心理测量 心理测量 心理测量
  • 心理测量 心理测量
  • 统计建模 统计建模

背景情况:

  • 心理尺度通常使用系数alpha报告可靠性,该系数假定所有分数级别的可靠性均.
  • 然而,可靠性可能是有条件的,在得分分布上有所不同,这个概念在物件响应理论 (IRT) 中已经很成熟,但许多心理学家不太了解.
  • 像alpha这样的单一可靠性指数的代表性可能会误导,当可靠性在各个评分范围之间有显著差异时.

研究的目的:

  • 通过探索条件可靠性来解决α系数的局限性.
  • 开发和介绍方法,一个R包和一个Shiny应用程序,用于量化α系数和条件可靠性之间的差异.
  • 为了使心理学家能够更好地理解和解释他们尺度得分的可靠性.

主要方法:

  • 开发一种新的统计方法来评估整个分数分布的条件可靠性.
  • 这种方法在一个用户友好的R包中实现.
  • 创建一个交互式的Shiny应用程序,用于可视化和比较系数alpha与条件可靠性估计.

主要成果:

  • 证明当条件可靠性在得分分布中异质时,α系数可能不代表.
  • 量化全球可靠性指数与特定得分点的可靠性之间的潜在差异,例如切断点.
  • 验证建议的方法和工具在心理学研究中的实际应用.

结论:

  • 阿尔法系数可能并不总是准确地反映特定得分的可靠性,特别是在关键决策点.
  • 开发的工具有助于更细致地了解规模可靠性,而不仅仅是单一的总结统计数据.
  • 鼓励心理学家考虑条件可靠性,以便对测量精度进行更全面的评估.