Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Experimental Designs01:16

Experimental Designs

11.1K
An experimental design is a systematic process that allows researchers to evaluate the relationship between dependent and independent variables. There are three widely used types of experimental design - pre-experimental design, true experimental design, and quasi-experimental design. In pre-experimental design, the researcher compares the data before and after some interventions or treatments. The true-experimental design has more than one purposefully created group, a commonly measured...
11.1K
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation01:20

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

1.6K
Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
1.6K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Seven ways to get a grip on using participant observation in medical education research.

Canadian medical education journal·2026
Same author

Perspectives on Involving Patients in the Teaching and Assessment of Entrustable Professional Activities in Competence by Design.

The clinical teacher·2025
Same author

An Innovative Course on Involving Patients in Health Professions Education.

Perspectives on medical education·2024
Same author

Anti-oppression pedagogy in health professions: a scoping review.

Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice·2024
Same author

Extending social accountability mandates to biomedical research in Canadian faculties of medicine.

Canadian medical education journal·2024
Same author

A Medical Education Research Library: key research topics and associated experts.

Medical education online·2024
Same journal

Adoption and Variability of Longitudinal Clinical Experiences, Including Longitudinal Integrated Clerkships, in U.S. Allopathic Medical Schools: A Comprehensive Review.

Journal of medical education and curricular development·2026
Same journal

Medical Student Preparedness to Counsel Parents on Childhood Vaccines and Address Vaccine Hesitancy: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Journal of medical education and curricular development·2026
Same journal

Raising the bar: Can an Online Module With a Validated Tool Improve Clerkship Evaluations?

Journal of medical education and curricular development·2026
Same journal

Educational Effects of Training With a Virtual Reality-Based Objective Structured Clinical Examination Software.

Journal of medical education and curricular development·2026
Same journal

Caring for Children in Immigrant Families and Children in Low-Income Families: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Pediatric Residents.

Journal of medical education and curricular development·2026
Same journal

Escalating Research Output After the USMLE Step 1 Pass/Fail Transition: Implications for Equity, Ethics, and the Orthopaedic Residency Match.

Journal of medical education and curricular development·2026
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: May 27, 2025

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View
05:26

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View

Published on: January 7, 2019

6.6K

通过设计对程序能力的评估:混合方法研究

Jenna Milosek1, Kaylee Eady1, Katherine A Moreau1

  • 1Faculty of Education, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Journal of medical education and curricular development
|February 19, 2025
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

大多数设计能力 (CBD) 居住计划都会评估其有效性,但这些评估的质量往往是不够的. 加强评估实践需要更多的资源和对CBD计划的支持.

关键词:
设计能力通过设计能力.基于能力的医学教育.项目评价 项目评价

更多相关视频

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
12:55

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Published on: September 27, 2020

8.3K
Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools
11:29

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools

Published on: June 20, 2020

9.0K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: May 27, 2025

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View
05:26

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View

Published on: January 7, 2019

6.6K
Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
12:55

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Published on: September 27, 2020

8.3K
Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools
11:29

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools

Published on: June 20, 2020

9.0K

科学领域:

  • 医学教育 医学教育
  • 项目评价 项目评价
  • 住院培训 培训 住院培训

背景情况:

  • 设计能力 (CBD) 课程对于医学教育至关重要.
  • 关于评估CBD计划的文献有限.
  • 本研究评估了加拿大CBD居住计划中的评估活动.

研究的目的:

  • 评估CBD居住计划中程序评估的程度.
  • 探索程序评估的动机和障碍.
  • 检查当前的评估方法.
  • 在项目评估中确定能力建设策略.

主要方法:

  • 进行了一项两阶段混合方法研究.
  • 第一个阶段:对149名项目主管进行调查 (33.5%的响应率).
  • 第二阶段:采访15名节目主任,反复分析.

主要成果:

  • 85.2%的项目参与评估,但很少有人制定正式的问题或计划.
  • 评估的原因包括决策;障碍包括缺乏知识,资源和资金.
  • 项目面临的挑战包括有限的资源和依赖于临时方法.
  • 改进建议包括专业知识的发展,资源的获取和明确的期望.

结论:

  • 虽然大多数CBD项目都会进行评估,但它们的质量往往不够优.
  • 需要额外的资源和支持来改善CBD计划评估实践.
  • 加强评估对于实现CBD计划的全部潜力至关重要.