对于农村中学来说,旁观者欺凌干预的可用性测试:混合方法研究研究
Aida Midgett1,2, Diana M Doumas1,2, Claudia Peralta1
1Boise State University, Boise, ID, United States.
JMIR human factors
|February 21, 2025
概括
这项研究发现,STAC-T旁观者欺凌干预应用程序对于农村中学学生和工作人员来说非常有用和可接受. 这些发现支持进一步的试验,以测试这种基于技术的欺凌预防计划.
科学领域:
- 公共卫生 公共卫生
- 教育心理学教育心理学
- 人与计算机的交互
背景情况:
- 在农村学校中,欺凌很普遍,对目标构成重大社会情感风险.
- 由于资源有限,传统的全校欺凌计划在农村环境中面临实施障碍.
- 基于技术的干预提供了一个可扩展的解决方案,以增加农村社区获得欺凌预防的机会.
研究的目的:
- 评估STAC-T旁观者欺凌干预应用程序的可用性和可接受性.
- 为了比较学校人员和学生之间的可用性感知.
- 收集有关计划特征,实用性和农村实施可行性的定性反.
主要方法:
- 对来自两个农村中学的21名参与者 (学校人员和学生) 进行了可用性测试和定性采访.
- 描述性统计和独立样本t测试评估了可用性和满意度等级.
- 使用共识定性研究方法来分析主题反.
主要成果:
- STAC-T 应用程序显示出高的可用性,可接受性和可行性,两组用户都将其评价远高于平均水平.
- 学校的工作人员和学生都报告了高满意度和推该计划的可能性.
- 质量反强调了欺凌追踪器和干预策略的实用性,以及需要辅助教师/家长培训.
结论:
- STAC-T应用程序具有强大的可用性和可接受性,这表明它有可能在农村学校得到广泛采用.
- 结果支持向全面随机对照试验进行进展,以确定干预的有效性.
- 像STAC-T这样的基于技术的旁观者干预可以提高在服务不足的农村地区获得关键欺凌预防资源的机会.
相关概念视频
02:04Bullying
8.3K
A modern form of aggression is bullying. As you learn in your study of child development, socializing and playing with other children is beneficial for children’s psychological development. However, as you may have experienced as a child, not all play behavior has positive outcomes. Some children are aggressive and want to play roughly. Other children are selfish and do not want to share toys. One form of negative social interactions among children that has become a national concern is...
8.3K
02:09Bystander Effect
9.5K
The discussion of bullying highlights the problem of witnesses not intervening to help a victim. This is a common occurrence, as the following well-publicized event demonstrates. In 1964, in Queens, New York, a 19-year-old woman named Kitty Genovese was attacked by a person with a knife near the back entrance to her apartment building and again in the hallway inside her apartment building. When the attack occurred, she screamed for help numerous times and eventually died from her stab wounds.
9.5K
02:01Group Design
8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K
04:49Robbers Cave
14.2K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.2K
02:30Naturalistic Observations
15.4K
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
15.4K