预计在东部和南部非洲的长效艾滋病毒暴露前预防产品的成本门:一个数学建模研究
David Kaftan1, Monisha Sharma2, Danielle Resar3
1Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, 10016, USA.
Journal of the International AIDS Society
|February 25, 2025
概括
负担得起的长效暴露前预防 (LA-PrEP) 对东部和南部非洲的艾滋病毒预防至关重要. 风险优先推广和降低价格是使LA-PrEP在该地区具有成本效益的关键.
科学领域:
- 公共卫生 公共卫生
- 流行病学 流行病学
- 卫生经济学 卫生经济学
背景情况:
- 东部和南部非洲 (ESA) 需要负担得起的艾滋病毒预防工具.
- 长期作用的暴露前预防 (LA-PrEP) 是有前途的,但在ESA面临医疗保健资源限制.
- 估计LA-PrEP的成本效益值对于资源有限的环境至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 确定南非,津巴布韦和肯尼亚的LA-PrEP产品的最大成本效益价格.
- 为了比较不同LA-PrEP配方 (口服,每2个月,每6个月注射) 和推广策略的成本效益.
- 模拟LA-PrEP对35年来艾滋病毒感染的影响.
主要方法:
- 一个基于代理的模型 (EMOD-HIV) 在三个ESA国家模拟了LA-PrEP的推出.
- 覆盖范围在5%-20%的艾滋病毒阴性成年人之间,优先考虑与统一的风险组向.
- 成本效益被定义为<500美元每次残疾调整后避免的生命年,比较LA-PrEP与每日口服PrEP.
主要成果:
- 风险优先的LA-PrEP (5%覆盖率) 避免了11-21%的艾滋病毒感染,成本高于非优先的部署.
- 6个月内注射LA-PrEP的每剂量最大成本因国家而异:南非 (52.99美元),津巴布韦 (14.64美元),肯尼亚 (7.50美元).
- 每月口服LA-PrEP的最大每剂费用较低:南非 (5.02美元),津巴布韦 (1.45美元),肯尼亚 (0.87美元).
结论:
- 在ESA中,LA-PrEP的成本效益对定价和推广策略敏感.
- 降低LA-PrEP定价和/或风险优先实施是成本效益的必要条件.
- 有针对性的推广策略可以在预算限制范围内最大限度地提高LA-PrEP对公共卫生的影响.
相关概念视频
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Pharmacodynamic Models: Additive and Proportional Drug Effect Model
Drug response models describe how pharmacological agents interact with biological systems to produce measurable effects. Baseline responses are inherent physiological activities without a drug significantly influencing the observed pharmacological outcomes. Depending on the drug response model employed, these baseline responses may combine with the drug's effect in either an additive or proportional manner.Additive Drug Response ModelIn the additive model, the drug effect is independent of the...
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
PK–PD modeling has significantly influenced FDA regulatory decisions, particularly drug approval, dosage optimization, and labeling. These models integrate pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) to predict drug behavior and effects, aiding in optimizing dosing regimens and enhancing the probability of clinical trial success.One notable example is Nesiritide (Natrecor®), a recombinant human brain natriuretic peptide for treating acute decompensated congestive heart failure (CHF).


