概率格式对差异任务的影响,第1部分:做数字有意义的系统性审查
Natalie C Benda1, Brian J Zikmund-Fisher2,3,4, Mohit M Sharma5
1Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY, USA.
MDM policy & practice
|February 25, 2025
概括
了解健康概率至关重要. 使用每 10^n 的比率和结合图形的数据显著改善了概率差异的计算,有助于健康决策.
科学领域:
- 卫生沟通健康沟通
- 决策科学科学 决策科学
- 信息设计是信息设计.
背景情况:
- "让数字变得有意义"项目进行了一项系统性审查,以指导健康概率数据的呈现.
- 本综述侧重于"差异任务",个人评估概率变化,例如风险因素的影响.
研究的目的:
- 评估数据呈现格式对健康概率传播的影响.
- 评估格式如何影响识别,回忆,对比,分类和计算概率差异.
主要方法:
- 对实验和准实验研究进行系统审查,比较定量健康信息格式.
- 包括来自35项多个数据库和手动搜索的35项研究中的53项研究结果.
- 提取关于刺激,认知任务和感知,情感,认知或行为结果的数据.
主要成果:
- 关于格式对大多数差异级认知任务的影响的证据较弱或不足.
- 强有力的证据表明,使用每10^n的比率比百分比或"在X"比率更容易计算差异.
- 将图形添加到数值数据中,可以更轻松地执行差异级计算.
结论:
- 很少有研究具有足够的可比性来产生关于概率差异评估的强有力的证据.
- 推每10^n率和图形增强来改善健康沟通中概率差异的计算.
相关概念视频
Random and Systematic Errors
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
Random Error
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test
Sometimes, a data set can have a recorded numerical observation that greatly deviates from the rest of the data. Assuming that the data is normally distributed, a statistical method called the Grubbs test can be used to determine whether the observation is truly an outlier. To perform a two-tailed Grubbs test, first, calculate the absolute difference between the outlier and the mean. Then, calculate the ratio between this difference and the standard deviation of the sample. This number is...
Data Validation
Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
Key parameters for method validation include:
Random and Systematic Errors
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...


