带有儿童座椅的自行车后部撞击的实验和有限元分析
Takaaki Terashima1, Ryuga Miyata2, Koji Mizuno2
1National Research Institute of Police Science, 6-3-1, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa-shi, Chiba 277-0882, Japan; Nagoya University, Graduate School of Engineering, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8603, Japan.
Journal of safety research
|February 25, 2025
概括
儿童自行车座椅的安全性至关重要. 车辆与车后碰撞显示,受伤风险取决于轮胎大小,较小的轮胎提供更好的稳定性,并可能减少儿童头部撞击的严重程度.
科学领域:
- 生物力学 生物力学
- 交通安全工程 交通安全工程
- 步行者和骑自行车者的安全.
背景情况:
- 携带儿童的自行车在日本城市中很受欢迎,用于学龄前儿童的运输.
- 防止碰撞和减轻这些自行车上的儿童受伤需要进一步的研究.
- 这项研究调查了汽车与儿童座椅相撞的儿童伤害风险.
研究的目的:
- 分析儿童乘客在自行车后部碰撞中的运动行为.
- 为了评估汽车撞击时后置儿童座椅中的儿童受伤的风险.
- 根据自行车轮胎尺寸来比较这些风险.
主要方法:
- 使用汽车撞击带有后置儿童座椅的自行车的碰撞测试.
- 使用Hybrid III 3岁和5F人偶来模拟儿童和骑手.
- 用混合III和THUMS模型进行有限元 (FE) 分析,以进行详细的影响分析.
主要成果:
- 带有20英寸轮胎的自行车显示前进运动,而26英寸轮胎则抬起前轮.
- 儿童头部受伤的风险在地面撞击时最高,然后是骑手撞击,然后是汽车引擎盖撞击.
- FE分析证实了儿童和成人骑手因相互撞击而可能受到伤害.
结论:
- 自行车轮胎尺寸显著影响运动行为和后端碰撞中的受伤潜力.
- 这些发现有助于选择适合儿童座椅的自行车,并设计特定尺寸的座椅.
- 不同的伤害风险突出显示了轮胎尺寸对儿童骑自行车安全的重要性.
相关概念视频
Normal and Tangetial Components: Problem Solving
169
Consider a man with a mass of 70 kg seated in a chair connected to a pin support through a member BC. If the man maintains an upright position, the task is to determine the horizontal and vertical reactions of the chair on the man when the member makes a 45° angle with the horizontal. At this moment, the man has a speed of 5 m/s, increasing at a rate of 1 m/s².
169
Design Consideration
177
Designing a structure involves a series of considerations, primarily the material's ultimate strength, calculated through tests that measure changes under increased force until the material reaches its breaking point or limit. The ultimate load, where the material breaks, is divided by its original cross-sectional area, resulting in the ultimate normal stress or strength. The ultimate shearing stress is another significant factor taken into account.
The factor of safety is another key...
The factor of safety is another key...
177
Impact Loading on a Cantilever Beam
362
The analysis of a cantilever beam with a circular cross-section subjected to impact loading at its free end illustrates the conversion of potential energy from a dropped object into kinetic energy, which is then absorbed by the beam as strain energy. This process is crucial for understanding how materials behave under dynamic loads, which is important in fields such as construction and aerospace.
When an object is dropped onto the free end of a cantilever, its potential energy due to gravity is...
When an object is dropped onto the free end of a cantilever, its potential energy due to gravity is...
362
Frames: Problem Solving II
179
Consider a hydraulic hoist supporting a load of 1 kN. Assuming a simplified schematic representation of this frame structure, the force acting on BD and BF members can be determined.
179
Elastic Collisions: Case Study
13.3K
Elastic collision of a system demands conservation of both momentum and kinetic energy. To solve problems involving one-dimensional elastic collisions between two objects, the equations for conservation of momentum and conservation of internal kinetic energy can be used. For the two objects, the sum of momentum before the collision equals the total momentum after the collision. An elastic collision conserves internal kinetic energy, and so the sum of kinetic energies before the collision equals...
13.3K
Rigid Body Equilibrium Problems - II
7.0K
A rigid body is in static equilibrium when the net force and the net torque acting on the system are equal to zero.
Consider two children sitting on a seesaw, which has negligible mass. The first child has a mass (m1) of 26 kg and sits at point A, which is 1.6 meters (r1) from the pivot point B; the second child has a mass (m2) of 32 kg and sits at point C. How far from the pivot point B should the second child sit (r2) to balance the seesaw?
Consider two children sitting on a seesaw, which has negligible mass. The first child has a mass (m1) of 26 kg and sits at point A, which is 1.6 meters (r1) from the pivot point B; the second child has a mass (m2) of 32 kg and sits at point C. How far from the pivot point B should the second child sit (r2) to balance the seesaw?
7.0K


