兴趣和变革性的经验作为地质科学学术和职业选择的预测者
Amanda D Manzanares1, Kevin J Pugh1
1School of Psychological Sciences, University of Northern Colorado, Greeley, CO 80639, USA.
Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)
|February 26, 2025
概括
变革性的经验和对地质科学的兴趣显著预测了学生的学术和职业选择. 经验后的兴趣完全调解了这些选择,突出了参与度.
科学领域:
- 地质科学 地质科学
- 在STEM教育方面.
背景情况:
- 在STEM领域招聘和留住学生仍然具有挑战性.
- 目前的模式专注于域名兴趣和身份,用于招聘和保留.
- 地质科学在吸引和留住学生方面面临特别困难,导致劳动力短缺.
研究的目的:
- 研究转变性经验与领域兴趣/身份结合在预测地质科学的学术和职业选择中的作用.
- 检查深度参与和学习的应用如何影响教育和职业道路.
- 了解地质科学学术和职业选择的预测因素.
主要方法:
- 收集了来自美国三所大学60名学生的调查数据.
- 采用分层多重回归来分析预测因素.
- 在模型中包括自我效能,地质科学前的兴趣/身份,变革性经验和地质科学后的兴趣/身份.
主要成果:
- 完全回归模型解释了69%的地质科学学术/职业选择差异.
- 逐步回归表明,地质科学后的兴趣/身份完全调解了其他预测因素和职业选择之间的关系.
- 地质科学前的兴趣/身份和变革性经验是重要的预测因素.
结论:
- 变革性的经验和最初的兴趣/身份对于地质科学学术和职业选择至关重要.
- 开发和培养变革性的经验可以增强学生的参与和坚持地质科学.
- 地质科学后的兴趣/身份是一个关键因素,表明积极的经验巩固了对该领域的承诺.
更多相关视频
06:57Utilizing Electroencephalography Measurements for Comparison of Task-Specific Neural Efficiencies: Spatial Intelligence Tasks
Published on: August 9, 2016
11.3K
10:17Improving Student Outcomes with an Adaptable Molecular Cloning Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience
Published on: November 15, 2024
905
相关概念视频
Influence of Parents and Peers on Identity
41
Adolescence is a pivotal period of identity formation, during which individuals begin to answer questions central to their sense of self, such as "Who am I?" and "Who do I hope to become?" Both parents and peers play critical roles in guiding adolescents through this complex developmental phase.
Parental Influence on Identity Development
Parents serve as primary guides and managers in an adolescent's life, offering support instrumental in decision-making and personal growth....
Parental Influence on Identity Development
Parents serve as primary guides and managers in an adolescent's life, offering support instrumental in decision-making and personal growth....
41
Reliability and Validity
12.7K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
12.7K
Marcia's Theory of Identity Status
77
James Marcia's identity status model provides a framework for understanding how adolescents navigate identity formation through varying degrees of exploration and commitment. Marcia's model builds on Erik Erikson's theories of psychosocial development, focusing specifically on how adolescents reconcile individual aspirations with societal expectations. His model describes identity formation as a dynamic process where adolescents move between different states depending on their level...
77
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
49.6K
According to Charles Cooley, we base our image on what we think other people see (Cooley 1902). We imagine how we must appear to others, then react to this speculation. We don certain clothes, prepare our hair in a particular manner, wear makeup, use cologne, and the like—all with the notion that our presentation of ourselves is going to affect how others perceive us. We expect a certain reaction, and, if lucky, we get the one we desire and feel good about it. But more than that, Cooley...
49.6K
Cause and Effect
10.8K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
10.8K
Statistical Significance
20.1K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
20.1K
