Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Naturalistic Observations02:30

Naturalistic Observations

15.4K
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
15.4K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K
Robbers Cave04:49

Robbers Cave

14.2K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.2K
Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

13.9K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
13.9K
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

22.9K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
22.9K
Case Studies01:22

Case Studies

11.6K
There are many research methods available to psychologists in their efforts to understand, describe, and explain behavior and the cognitive and biological processes that underlie it.
11.6K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

The Implementation of Competency-Based Medical Education in Surgical Training: A Scoping Review.

Journal of surgical education·2026
Same author

Investigating a Model to Predict Milestones From Entrustable Professional Activity Levels for Medicine-Pediatrics Residents.

Academic pediatrics·2026
Same author

A scoping review of inquiry in medicine and nursing using Dewey's perspective.

Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice·2026
Same author

The reliability of the College of Intensive Care Medicine of Australia and New Zealand viva examination.

Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine·2026
Same author

What could we learn from team sports? Cohesion as a lens to understand research teams in health professions education.

Medical education·2026
Same author

Validity Evidence for the Pediatric Emergency Medicine Milestones and Associations With American Board of Pediatrics Certification Examinations Among US Fellows, 2015-2022.

AEM education and training·2026
Same journal

Ten-year outcomes from the Columbia-Bassett program: a model for strengthening the underserved health workforce.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2026
Same journal

Artificial intelligence teaching assistants: a scalable solution for supporting struggling medical students.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2026
Same journal

MDCU MedUMORE: a national digital platform for equitable and lifelong medical education in Thailand and beyond.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2026
Same journal

The Minority Ophthalmology Mentoring Program: A Model for Increasing Diversity in Surgical Specialties.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2026
Same journal

Toward a global ecosystem for health professions education: harnessing open educational resources and generative AI with shared governance.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2026
Same journal

Associations of marital status with well-being and career intentions among medical residents: a national survey in Japan.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2026
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: May 25, 2025

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.8K

描述研究团队的特点

Meredith E Young, Tim Dubé, Daniel J Schumacher

    Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges
    |February 26, 2025
    PubMed
    概括
    此摘要是机器生成的。

    有效的健康专业教育研究依赖于精心组成的团队. 了解不同类型的研究团队,确保正确的专业知识与学术目标相匹配,以实现最佳的知识生成和整合.

    更多相关视频

    The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
    06:18

    The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

    Published on: October 20, 2022

    2.0K
    The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
    06:48

    The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

    Published on: January 19, 2019

    9.3K

    相关实验视频

    Last Updated: May 25, 2025

    The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
    14:14

    The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

    Published on: May 13, 2022

    5.8K
    The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
    06:18

    The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

    Published on: October 20, 2022

    2.0K
    The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
    06:48

    The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

    Published on: January 19, 2019

    9.3K

    科学领域:

    • 健康 职业 教育 教育 专业
    • 学术研究学术研究
    • 团队科学 团队科学

    背景情况:

    • 卫生专业教育 (HPE) 研究经常由跨学科的团队进行.
    • 合作努力对于解决复杂的问题和推进HPE学术目标至关重要.
    • 优化团队组成对于有效的知识生成和集成至关重要.

    研究的目的:

    • 描述卫生专业教育中的研究团队的特点.
    • 根据其组成和功能,划分四种不同类型的研究小组.
    • 提供有关将团队组成与特定研究目标相匹配的指导.

    主要方法:

    • 对HPE团队科学和协作现有研究的文献综述.
    • 研究小组分为四种不同的类型.
    • 分析团队组成,目标和运营策略.

    主要成果:

    • 确定和描述四种类型的研究小组.
    • 对每个团队类型的"谁,什么,如何,什么时候"进行分析.
    • 强调调整团队结构与研究目标的重要性.

    结论:

    • 战略团队的形成对于成功的HPE研究至关重要.
    • 了解不同的研究团队模型有助于有效的协作.
    • 这个框架有助于优化团队动态,以促进HPE的知识进步.