使用诊断代码定义与年龄相关的黄斑退化症队列的变化
Fritz Gerald Paguiligan Kalaw1,2, Jimmy S Chen1,2, Sally L Baxter1,2
1Division of Ophthalmology Informatics and Data Science, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology and Shiley Eye Institute, University of California San Diego, 9415 Campus Point Dr MC0946, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
概括
确定与年龄相关的黄斑变性 (AMD) 研究的患者队列有很大的差异. 不一致使用国际疾病分类 (ICD) 代码导致研究中AMD患者的表现不准确.
科学领域:
- 眼科医生 眼科 眼科
- 医疗信息学 医疗信息学
- 生物统计学 生物统计学
背景情况:
- 电子健康记录 (EHR) 的二次分析对研究至关重要.
- 与年龄相关的黄斑变性 (AMD) 是导致失明的主要原因.
- 缺乏标准化方法来识别EHR数据中的AMD患者队列.
研究的目的:
- 调查国际疾病分类 (ICD) 代码使用的变化,以定义与年龄相关的黄斑变性 (AMD) 患者队列.
- 评估出版文献中AMD队列定义的准确性和完整性.
主要方法:
- 对37篇研究AMD的文章进行了系统审查.
- 分析出版年份,数据集来源,受试者数和使用的ICD代码 (ICD-9,ICD-9-CM,ICD-10,ICD-10-CM).
- 评估队列定义的准确性,完整性和与AMD相关性的评估.
主要成果:
- 在ICD代码用于AMD队列识别方面存在实质性的差异.
- 使用ICD-10代码的研究表明,与ICD-9/9-CM (7%) 相比,ICD-10代码的准确性更高 (78%).
- 72%的队列定义有不完整或缺失的AMD代码,35%包括无关代码.
结论:
- 目前使用ICD代码定义AMD患者队列的方法不一致,经常不准确.
- 标准化ICD代码的使用对于可重现的研究和可靠的AMD队列识别至关重要.
- 在眼科研究中对二次EHR数据分析需要改进数据协调.
相关概念视频
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)
35
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) serves as the primary classification system for mental health disorders, providing standardized diagnostic criteria for clinicians and researchers. First published by the American Psychiatric Association (APA) in 1952, the DSM has undergone several revisions to reflect evolving psychiatric understanding. The fifth edition, DSM-5, released in 2013, introduced key updates that expanded diagnostic categories and modified diagnostic...
35
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
283
Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods:
283
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
127
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
127
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
125
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
125
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
118
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
118


