Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

6.7K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
6.7K
Cluster Sampling Method01:20

Cluster Sampling Method

11.6K
Appropriate sampling methods ensure that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
11.6K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

79
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
79
Group Design02:01

Group Design

8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K
Weighted Mean00:57

Weighted Mean

4.9K
While taking the arithmetic, geometric, or harmonic mean of a sample data set, equal importance is assigned to all the data points. However, all the values may not always be equally important in some data sets. An intrinsic bias might make it more important to give more weightage to specific values over others.
For example, consider the number of goals scored in the matches of a tournament. While computing the average number of goals scored in the tournament, it may be more important to...
4.9K
Sampling Plans01:23

Sampling Plans

163
Sampling is a crucial step in analytical chemistry, allowing researchers to collect representative data from a large population. Common sampling methods include random, judgmental, systematic, stratified, and cluster sampling.
Random sampling is a method where each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample. It involves selecting individuals randomly, often using random number generators or lottery-type methods. For example, when analyzing the properties of a...
163

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Principal stratification with U-statistics under principal ignorability.

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology·2026
Same author

A comparison of methods for designing hybrid type 2 cluster-randomized trials with continuous effectiveness and implementation endpoints.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same author

Addressing Cluster-Level Treatment Effect Heterogeneity in Sample Size Determination for Hierarchical 2 × 2 Factorial Designs.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same author

Time-Varying Treatment Effect Models in Stepped-Wedge Cluster-Randomized Trials With Multiple Interventions.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Doubly Robust Estimators of the Restricted Mean Time in Favor Estimands in Individual- and Cluster-Randomized Trials.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Bayesian Inference for Cluster-Randomized Trials With Multivariate Outcomes Subject to Both Truncation by Death and Missingness.

Statistics in medicine·2026

相关实验视频

Updated: May 23, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.3K

通过权衡解决集群随机实验中的选择偏差.

Georgia Papadogeorgou1, Bo Liu2, Fan Li3,4

  • 1Department of Statistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, United States.

Biometrics
|March 7, 2025
PubMed
概括

随机化后招募的集群随机化试验可能会导致选择偏差. 本研究定义了因果估计值,并使用反向概率权重来估计招募人群中的治疗效应,解决集群随机实验中的偏差.

关键词:
有关因果推理的推理.集群随机试验是指一个集群随机试验.主要分层的主要分层.选择偏差是一种选择偏差.灵敏度分析是一种灵敏度分析.工作倾向得分的工作倾向得分.

更多相关视频

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.4K
A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats
09:28

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats

Published on: May 6, 2021

4.4K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: May 23, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.3K
Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.4K
A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats
09:28

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats

Published on: May 6, 2021

4.4K

科学领域:

  • 生物统计学 生物统计学
  • 临床试验 临床试验
  • 流行病学 流行病学

背景情况:

  • 集群随机实验通常在治疗分配后招募参与者,从而导致潜在的选择偏差.
  • 数据的可用性通常仅限于招募的样本,从而在总体和招募人群之间产生差异.
  • 随机化后的招募可以在招募样本中引发干预和控制臂之间的系统差异.

研究的目的:

  • 在随机化后招募的集群随机化实验中,为整体和招募人群定义因果估计值.
  • 开发方法来估计治疗效果,尽管潜在的选择偏差.
  • 在总人口中确定可估计治疗效果的有意义的子群体.

主要方法:

  • 定义整体和招募人群的因果估计.
  • 证明对被招募人群的平均治疗效果的一致估计,使用无视招募的逆概率权重.
  • 使用主要分层来确定治疗对特定亚群的影响.
  • 开发一个估计策略和敏感性分析,以忽略招聘假设.
  • 在CRTrecruit R包中的实施方法.

主要成果:

  • 在不可忽视的招聘假设下,可以使用反向概率加权来一致估计被招募人群的平均治疗效应.
  • 治疗对整体人口的平均效果通常是无法识别的.
  • 治疗效应可以确定子群体:那些总是被招募的和那些只在治疗中被招募的.
  • 对ARTEMIS试验的应用显示,在总是招募的人群中,P2Y$_{12}$抑制剂的持久性增加.

结论:

  • 提供了方法来解决集群随机化实验中的选择偏差,随机化后招募.
  • 该研究提供了一个框架,用于估计特定亚群体的治疗效应,当整体人口效应无法识别时.
  • CRTrecruit R包和灵敏度分析有助于在现实研究中应用和验证这些方法.