临床试验患者选择的主要结果:ENHANCE-AF结果调查
Randall S Stafford1, Eli N Rice2, Rushil Shah3
1Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford, California, United States of America.
PloS one
|March 7, 2025
概括
患有心房的患者更喜欢使用决策冲突量表 (DCS) 而不是决策后悔量表 (DRS) 来评估决策. DCS被选为ENHANCE-AF试验的主要终点.
科学领域:
- 心脏病学 心脏病学
- 医疗保健服务研究 医疗服务研究
- 患者为中心的结果.
背景情况:
- 前庭动 (AFib) 管理需要共享使用抗凝剂的决策.
- 以患者为中心的结果对于评估决策工具至关重要.
- 在ENHANCE-AF试验中,研究了一种用于AFib抗凝决定的数字工具.
研究的目的:
- 为了确定ENHANCE-AF试验中最合适的患者选择的初级结局.
- 为了比较患者在决策冲突量表 (DCS) 和决策后悔量表 (DRS) 之间的偏好.
- 检查影响结果选择的人口和临床因素.
主要方法:
- 一项对100名非膜性AFib.参与者的横截面调查.
- 参与者根据对决策经验的相关性对DCS (16项) 和DRS (5项) 进行了排名.
- 使用CHA2DS2VASc得分进行风险分层 (男性≥2,女性≥3).
- 多变量逻辑回归分析了与规模选择相关的因素.
主要成果:
- 77%的参与者更喜欢DCS而不是DRS (95%CI:68-85%).
- 所有子组都支持DCS.
- 与较低得分 (<5) (p=0.002) 相比,具有较高CHA2DS2VASc得分 (≥5) 的患者对DCS的偏好较弱.
结论:
- 决定性冲突量表 (DCS) 是心房的患者更喜欢使用的,用于测量决策的经验.
- DCS被选为ENHANCE-AF临床试验的主要终点.
- 患者的特征,特别是CHA2DS2VASc分数,影响结果测量选择.
相关概念视频
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
111
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
111
Blind Procedures
10.6K
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which...
10.6K
Cancer Survival Analysis
318
Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
318


