用电子健康记录预测患者结果时减轻结果混
S Momsen Reincke1,2,3, Camilo Espinosa1,2,3, Philip Chung1
1Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, United States.
由于混因素,人工智能 (AI) 疾病预测模型的特异性可能很差. 多类人工智能架构有效地提高了特异性,并减少了与单一结果模型相比的结果混.
科学领域:
- 医疗信息学 医疗信息学
- 医疗保健中的人工智能
- 临床流行病学临床流行病学
背景情况:
- 使用电子健康记录 (EHR) 的人工智能 (AI) 模型显示出疾病预测和风险分层的前景.
- 然而,单一结果的人工智能模型可能缺乏特异性,导致假阳性和相关的患者负担.
- 混因素可以显著影响这些预测模型的准确性.
研究的目的:
- 评估混因子对单一结果AI疾病预测模型的特异性的影响.
- 评估多类人工智能架构在减轻结果结合和提高特异性的有效性.
- 在真实世界和模拟的临床数据中,比较单一结果与多类模型的性能.
主要方法:
- 一个先进的AI模型从EHR疾病代码预测胰腺癌,在230万患者队列中进行了评估.
- 一个预测多种癌症类型的多类AI模型同时被开发和比较.
- 进行了一项临床模拟实验,以调查混因子对单个结果模型特异性的影响.
主要成果:
- 胰腺癌预测模型的得分与卵巢癌相关,这表明结果因混因素而混.
- 临床模拟证实,混因素会损害单一结果AI预测模型的特异性.
- 多类架构增强了预测癌症类型的特异性,同时保持了性能,解决了结果的混.
结论:
- 单一结果的AI疾病预测模型容易受到潜在混因素引起的结果混的影响.
- 多类人工智能架构提供了使用EHR数据进行疾病预测的更具体和更强大的方法.
- 仔细考虑预测结果的数量对于可靠的AI疾病风险预测至关重要.
更多相关视频
06:55Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
相关概念视频
Methods of Documentation VII: EMR
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Regression Toward the Mean
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
