对不确定性的不容忍因果关系影响着犹不决
Helmut Appel1, Alexander L Gerlach1
1Institute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
The British journal of clinical psychology
|March 11, 2025
概括
增加对不确定性的不容忍 (IU) 直接导致更大的犹. 这项研究实验性地证明了IU与难以做出决定,影响心理健康之间的因果关系.
科学领域:
- 心理学 心理学 心理学
- 认知科学 认知科学
- 临床心理学 临床心理学
背景情况:
- 不确定性不耐受 (IU) 是对不确定性的关键负面反应,也是精神障碍的跨诊断风险因素.
- IU与犹不决,决策困难有关,这也与各种心理健康状况有关.
- 以前的研究表明,IU会导致犹不决,但缺乏实验证据.
研究的目的:
- 实验性地研究不确定性不容忍 (IU) 和不决心之间的因果关系.
- 为了确定操纵IU水平是否会影响个体的决策能力.
- 探索情境IU在调解这种效果中的作用.
主要方法:
- 一项预先注册的研究,共有301名参与者.
- 试验操作IU (增加,减少或控制).
- 在个人相关的情境背景下评估犹不决.
主要成果:
- 操纵成功改变了参与者的IU水平.
- 与IU减少相比,增加IU导致明显更高的犹.
- 发现情境IU能够调解实验操纵对不决心的影响.
结论:
- 这项研究提供了第一个实验证据,证明了IU和犹之间存在因果关系.
- 研究结果阐明了不确定性管理在决策困难中的作用.
- 结果强调了IU在不决心的跨诊断性质中的重要性,并为心理健康治疗提供了信息.
更多相关视频
06:45Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
Published on: April 18, 2017
6.1K
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
612
相关概念视频
Reason and Intuition
6.3K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.3K
Decision Making
78
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
78
Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance
41
Avoidance-avoidance conflict refers to a psychological situation where a person must choose between two or more unpleasant alternatives. These conflicts are particularly stressful because neither option is desirable. This dilemma is often expressed in sayings like "caught between a rock and a hard place" or "between the devil and the deep blue sea." For instance, individuals who fear dental procedures may find themselves torn between enduring a painful toothache or facing the...
41
Cause and Effect
10.8K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
10.8K
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
7.2K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.2K
Uncertainty: Overview
495
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
495
