上臂对前臂放置长外围导管用于取血样:一个随机对照试验
Amit Bahl1, Matthew Drogowski, Akhil Gutta
1Author Affiliations: Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan (Drs Bahl, Drogowski); Department of Emergency Medicine, Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan (Drs Gutta, Lehman, Younes, and Ms DiLoreto); and Corewell Health Research Institute, Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan (Dr Shen).
长外围导管 (LPC) 的放置地点没有显著影响血液采样或导管功能. 这项研究发现,对于这些结果,上臂和前臂插入之间没有差异.
科学领域:
- 血管接入装置 血管接入装置
- 医疗器械技术 医疗器械技术
- 临床试验 临床试验
背景情况:
- 长外围导管 (LPC) 的最佳放置位置,以确保有效的血液采样和导管功能仍然不确定.
- 了解特定站点的性能对于改善患者护理和设备有效性至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 为了研究和比较LPCs在上臂和前臂插入的结果.
- 根据插入部位,评估血液采样成功率,导管存活率和血栓形成率的差异.
主要方法:
- 这是一项随机试验,涉及88名患有静脉通道困难或需要长期治疗的成年患者.
- 参与者接受了8厘米,20度LPC随机分配到前臂或上臂.
- 评估的关键结果包括血液采样成功,导管停留时间和导管相关血栓的发生率.
主要成果:
- 血液采样失败在两组中都很常见,前臂 (83.3%) 和上臂 (78.1%) 的位置之间没有统计学上显著的差异.
- 这两个地点的平均停留时间和第一次采血失败的时间在两个地点之间是可比的.
- 虽然整体成功率和血栓形成率相似,但趋势表明,随着时间的推移,上臂位置的表现更好.
结论:
- 在前臂和上臂LPC插入部位之间的血液采样能力或整体功能方面没有观察到统计学上显著的差异.
- 调查结果表明,目前的LPC绩效指标并不强烈地支持一个网站,而不是另一个网站,尽管对长期趋势的进一步调查可能是有必要的.
相关概念视频
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Sites for measruring blood pressure
The Brachial Artery: Primary Site for Blood Pressure Measurement
Parentral Nutrition: Centeral and Peripheral Parental Nutrition
PN can be administered through two primary routes:
1. Central Parenteral Nutrition (CPN):
CPN involves delivering a high concentration of nutrients through a large vein. This is typically achieved using a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) or,...
Assessment of radial pulse
The radial pulse, located at the wrist, is often the preferred site for assessing peripheral pulse because of its accessibility and dependability. The process of determining the radial pulse involves several steps:
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Intravenous Regional Anesthesia
One of the advantages of...


