Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Observational Studies01:11

Observational Studies

Observational studies are a type of analytical study where researchers observe events without any interventions. In other words, the researcher does not influence the response variable or the experiment's outcome.
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One example of...
Bioequivalence: Overview01:16

Bioequivalence: Overview

Pharmaceutical equivalents, by definition, are drug products with the same active ingredient in the same quantities, encapsulated in identical dosage forms, and intended for the same administration routes. These pharmaceutical equivalents are deemed bioequivalent if the bioavailability of the active entity in the drug preparations is similar. Moreover, pharmaceutical equivalents demonstrating bioequivalence are also regarded as therapeutically equivalent. This means that when used as directed,...
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies.
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
Equity Theory01:26

Equity Theory

Equity theory explains how our sense of fairness influences the dynamics of close relationships. Rooted in social psychology, the theory posits that individuals evaluate fairness by comparing the ratio of their contributions to the rewards they receive. Relationship satisfaction is highest when these ratios are perceived as balanced between partners, promoting mutual reciprocity and a sense of justice.Equity vs. Equality in RelationshipsEquity is distinct from equality. Fairness does not...

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

A Comparison of a Novel Passive Nasoalveolar Molding Technique Versus Traditional Active Molding for Alveolar Cleft Reduction.

The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association·2026
Same author

Screening for social determinants of health in primary care: protocol for a feasibility study.

BJGP open·2026
Same author

Improving behavioural interventions in healthcare to address the needs of disadvantaged groups: A policy-focused evidence brief.

Public health in practice (Oxford, England)·2026
Same author

What works to improve health and digital health literacy in disadvantaged groups: A policy-focused evidence brief.

Public health in practice (Oxford, England)·2026
Same author

Improving case-finding of long-term health problems in disadvantaged communities: A Policy-focused Evidence Brief.

Public health in practice (Oxford, England)·2026
Same author

Addressing inequalities in the primary and secondary outpatient interface: A policy-focused evidence brief.

Public health in practice (Oxford, England)·2026

相关实验视频

Updated: May 11, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

23.4K

多重平等指南:以公平为中心的证据综合的新框架.

Lucy McCann1, Lucy Johnson1, Anna Gkiouleka1

  • 1Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

Public health in practice (Oxford, England)
|March 19, 2025
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

一个新的框架,EQUALSS GUIDE Multiple,扩展了PROGRESS-Plus,以更好地识别各种弱势群体的健康公平问题,包括那些有多种交叉的弱势和残疾的人.

更多相关视频

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

11.7K
The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.2K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: May 11, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

23.4K
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

11.7K
The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.2K

科学领域:

  • 医疗保健服务研究 医疗服务研究
  • 卫生公平研究 卫生公平研究
  • 健康的社会决定因素

背景情况:

  • 了解弱势群体之间的差异性干预效应对于健康公平至关重要.
  • 像PROGRESS-Plus这样的现有框架在捕捉不利因素的所有维度方面存在局限性.
  • 需要一个全面的框架来从公平的角度综合证据.

研究的目的:

  • 为以公平为重点的证据综合开发一个改进的框架.
  • 为了解决现有Progress-Plus框架的局限性.
  • 确保卫生干预措施不会加剧现有的不平等.

主要方法:

  • 重新分析了EQUALISE审查中的研究,以确定不利的领域.
  • 确定领域与现有 PROGRESS-Plus 框架进行比较.
  • 根据发现,开发一个新的,扩展的框架.

主要成果:

  • 通常评估的PROGRESS-Plus领域包括性别/性别,种族/种族和年龄.
  • 在PROGRESS-Plus框架中,没有明确纳入特定背景的群体,多重劣势和残疾.
  • 新的EQUALSS GUIDE多重框架包含了更广泛的不利领域.

结论:

  • EQUALSS GUIDE多重构建在 PROGRESS-Plus 上,提供更大的灵活性和全面性.
  • 这一框架有助于优先考虑减少健康差距的干预措施.
  • 它有助于防止可能扩大健康不平等的干预.