无意义被误解为一种效果的缺失在心理学中:流行率和时间分析
Stephen Lee Murphy1, Raphael Merz2, Linda-Elisabeth Reimann3
1Ghent University, Ghent, Flanders, Belgium.
Royal Society open science
|March 20, 2025
概括
心理学研究经常误解无意义的发现,认为没有影响. 这种常见的错误,在76-85%的文章中普遍存在,持续不改善,阻碍了科学进步.
科学领域:
- 心理学 心理学 心理学
- 科学方法科学方法学
- 研究解释研究解释
背景情况:
- 心理学研究中不重要的发现经常被误解.
- 这种误解的流行和趋势尚不清楚.
- 这种误解可能会导致错误的结论,即没有影响.
研究的目的:
- 为了确定误解心理学中不重要的发现的普遍性.
- 评估这个解释错误是否随着时间的推移而变化.
- 为了突出这一问题对心理学科学的影响.
主要方法:
- 检查了599篇心理学文章的讨论部分.
- 包括来自10个期刊的文章,跨越三个时间点 (2009年,2015年,2021年).
- 对不重要发现的编码解释.
主要成果:
- 76%-85%的文章误解了无意义的发现,认为没有影响.
- 54%62%明确声称无意义意味着没有人口影响.
- 只有4%-8%的人认为缺失效应的可能性.
结论:
- 误解不重要的发现是心理学中普遍存在的问题.
- 2009年至2021年间,患病率没有显著变化.
- 解决这种解释错误对于改善心理学科学至关重要.
更多相关视频
05:22Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: May 9, 2019
5.3K
06:45Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
Published on: April 18, 2017
6.1K
相关概念视频
Statistical Significance
20.1K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
20.1K
Significance Testing: Overview
3.3K
Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...
3.3K
Cause and Effect
10.8K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
10.8K
Regression Toward the Mean
6.3K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.3K
Sign Test for Matched Pairs
86
The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
86
Errors In Hypothesis Tests
4.1K
When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
4.1K
