在14岁儿童水平施加标准化力时,对上修改和常规口罩之间的压力分布模式的比较评估:三维有限元素分析分析:一个三维的有限元素分析
Shivani V Sawant1, Ritesh Kalaskar1
1Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Government Dental College and Hospital, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry
|March 20, 2025
概括
与传统型号相比,新的,更薄的口罩设计显著减少了大上的压力和位移. 这项创新旨在提高运动员的舒适性和可接受性,特别是在滑冰等运动中.
科学领域:
- 生物力学 生物力学
- 牙科材料科学 牙科材料科学
- 运动牙科 运动牙科
背景情况:
- 传统的口罩由于其厚度可能会让人感到不舒服,这可能会降低玩家的遵守.
- 开发更薄,更可接受的口罩对于运动员的保护至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 为了评估和比较修改后的,较薄的防嘴的应力分布模式,与传统的防嘴相比.
- 在标准化冲击力下评估新型口罩设计的生物力学性能.
主要方法:
- 用有限元分析 (FEA) 来建模和模拟应力分布.
- 用形光束计算机断层扫描 (CBCT) 扫描14岁的上下巴,以创建精确的口罩模型.
- 标准化的水平力为614N,应用于上大模型.
主要成果:
- 与传统类型相比,修改后的口罩表现出明显较低的应力分布 (最低1.83 MPa,最大24.04 MPa).
- 随着修改后的口罩 (0.000441毫米) 与传统的 (0.00624毫米) 相比,前区域的排位大大减少.
结论:
- 经过修改,更薄的口罩通过显示较低的应力和冲击下的位移来证明卓越的性能.
- 这种设计为增强口罩舒适度和体育运动中球员接受度提供了一个有希望的替代方案.
相关概念视频
Stress: General Loading Conditions
294
To grasp the intricacy of real-world conditions where multiple loads are applied simultaneously to a structure, one might visualize a section passing through a specific point within a body, aligned parallel to the xy plane. This section is subjected to various forces, including original loads, normal forces, and shearing forces.
The shearing force, possessing potential directionality within the plane of the section, is simplified into two component forces running parallel to the x and y axes....
The shearing force, possessing potential directionality within the plane of the section, is simplified into two component forces running parallel to the x and y axes....
294
Transformation of Plane Stress
178
Studying stress transformation is essential in understanding how stress components within a material, like a cube under plane stress, change with rotation. This change is analyzed by considering a prismatic element within the cube. As the element rotates, the stress components acting on itâboth normal and shearing stressesâchange in magnitude and orientation. This change is quantified using trigonometric functions of the rotation angle, relating the forces acting on the rotated...
178
Components of Stress
194
Stress analysis under multiple loading conditions is intricate, necessitating a comprehensive grasp of normal and shearing stresses. Consider a small cube at point O, subjected to stress on all six faces, visible or not. Normal stress components σx, σy, σz act perpendicularly to the x, y, and z axes. Shearing stress components τxy and τxz are exerted on faces perpendicular to these axes.
Interestingly, the hidden cube faces also experience these stresses, equal and...
Interestingly, the hidden cube faces also experience these stresses, equal and...
194
Three-Dimensional Analysis of Strain
188
Three-dimensional strain analysis is crucial for understanding how materials deform under stress, particularly in elastic, homogeneous materials. This method employs principal stress axes to simplify complex stress states into more understandable forms. Subjected to stress, a small cubic element within a material either expands or contracts along these axes, transforming into a rectangular parallelepiped. This transformation effectively illustrates the material's deformation. The principal...
188
Stress on an Oblique Plane
491
Understanding stress on an oblique plane under axial loading is pivotal in material mechanics. This analysis offers insight into a material's durability and strength, which is crucial for civil engineering and structural design. Axial loading refers to force application along the material's central axis, causing compression or elongation and leading to normal stress. Normal stress occurs when a force acts perpendicularly to the material's area, resulting in compressive or tensile...
491
Principal Stresses: Problem Solving
152
When analyzing two planes intersecting at right angles under the influence of shearing, tensile, and compressive stresses, it is essential to identify principal planes, maximum shearing stress, and principal stresses. To find the principal planes, apply a formula that equates them to twice the shearing stress divided by the difference between tensile and compressive stresses.
152


