Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Group Design02:01

Group Design

The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between the two are due to...
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
Woodward–Hoffmann Selection Rules and Microscopic Reversibility01:34

Woodward–Hoffmann Selection Rules and Microscopic Reversibility

Electrocyclic reactions, cycloadditions, and sigmatropic rearrangements are concerted pericyclic reactions that proceed via a cyclic transition state. These reactions are stereospecific and regioselective. The stereochemistry of the products depends on the symmetry characteristics of the interacting orbitals and the reaction conditions. Accordingly, pericyclic reactions are classified as either symmetry-allowed or symmetry-forbidden. Woodward and Hoffmann presented the selection criteria for...
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Rule following as choice: The role of reinforcement rate and rule accuracy on rule-following behavior.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2025
Same author

Compassion in Mexico and the United States: Unpacking Cultural Differences.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: May 12, 2026

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.0K

为了研究规则治理选择的程序:初步数据

David Ruiz Méndez1

  • 1Laboratorio de Análisis de la Conducta, Facultad de Estudios Superiores Iztacala, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, de los Barrios Ave. Number 1, Los Reyes Ixtacala, Tlalnepantla, , Estado de México C.P. 54090 México.

The Analysis of verbal behavior
|March 24, 2025
PubMed
概括

参与者遵循规则,在强化选项之间进行选择,在存在线索时偏好更高的比率. 没有规则或线索,偏好变得不系统,突出说明和歧视性刺激对选择行为的影响.

科学领域:

  • 行为心理学 行为心理学
  • 决策研究 决策研究
  • 强化学习是一种强化学习.

背景情况:

  • 在相互矛盾的规则下理解选择行为至关重要.
  • 强化率显著影响决策过程.
  • 歧视性刺激和明确规则在指导选择中的作用需要进一步研究.

研究的目的:

  • 模拟和研究两个不兼容的规则之间的选择行为.
  • 检查不同强化率如何影响规则遵循和选择.
  • 为了确定歧视性刺激的影响和明确的规则选择选择选择.

主要方法:

  • 进行了两项实验,使用一个由两个组件组成的多重时间表,同时具有可变的间隔 (VI) - 灭绝 (EXT) 时间表.
  • 实验1涉及本科生遵循与不同强化率相关的明确规则在特定的歧视性刺激下.
  • 实验2探索了没有明确规则的选择行为,只关注强化率和歧视性刺激.

主要成果:

  • 在实验1中,参与者遵守规则,在存在歧视性刺激时选择具有最高强化率的选项.
  • 当没有歧视性刺激时,参与者对他们的选择表现出漠不关心.
  • 实验2显示,参与者在有刺激的情况下更喜欢与更高的强化率相关的替代方案,但在没有刺激的情况下选择是不系统的.
关键词:
选择 选择 选择 选择人类人类人类.增强的速度 增强的速度规则 - 接下来的规则.规则 规则 规则 规则

更多相关视频

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

5.9K
Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats
09:12

Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats

Published on: March 17, 2019

9.4K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: May 12, 2026

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.0K
Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

5.9K
Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats
09:12

Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats

Published on: March 17, 2019

9.4K

结论:

  • 明确的规则和相关的歧视性刺激强烈指导选择行为向更高的强化率.
  • 强化率是选择的主要决定因素,特别是在存在线索时.
  • 缺少规则和歧视性刺激导致选择模式难以预测,这表明人们依赖已学会的关联或其他因素.