检查分心的司机的避免碰撞行为:一个相关的随机组合参数加速失效时间模型与异质性-in-means
Qikai Qu1, Yasir Ali2, Yongjun Shen3
1Southeast University, School of Transportation, No.2 SEU Road, Jiangning District, Nanjing 211189, China; Queensland University of Technology, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia.
Accident; analysis and prevention
|March 24, 2025
概括
不同的分心影响驾驶员避免碰撞. 手动分心延迟了危险反应,而这两种分心类型都减少了避免时间,这表明风险补偿. 性别也会影响避免碰撞的性能.
科学领域:
- 交通安全 交通安全
- 驾驶过程中的人类因素
- 汽车工程 汽车工程
背景情况:
- 目前关于分心驾驶的研究往往侧重于突如其来的情况.
- 在避免碰撞过程中,与各种分心类型相关的差异性碰撞风险尚未得到充分研究.
- 了解微妙的分心效应对于提高道路安全至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 在正常,认知和手动分心条件下调查和比较驾驶员在避免碰撞方面的表现.
- 在不同的分心下分析避免碰撞行为的关键时间组件.
- 确定分心类型和性别如何影响避免碰撞的策略.
主要方法:
- 44名持驾照的司机参加了驾驶模拟实验.
- 收集的数据包括危险反应时间,减速时间和避免碰撞的时间.
- 相关的分组随机参数加速失效时间模型被用于分析性能指标.
主要成果:
- 与认知分心相比,手动分心导致危险反应时间更长.
- 分心的司机通常表现出减少减速和避免碰撞的时间,这表明风险补偿.
- 观察到性别差异:男性在手动分散注意力的情况下有更长的回避时间,女性在认知分散注意力的情况下.
结论:
- 分心类型显著影响避免碰撞的行为和响应时间.
- 当司机分心时,他们可能会进行风险补偿,这可能会增加碰撞风险.
- 这些发现有助于开发有针对性的自动化避免碰撞辅助系统.
相关概念视频
Determination of Expected Frequency
2.1K
Suppose one wants to test independence between the two variables of a contingency table. The values in the table constitute the observed frequencies of the dataset. But how does one determine the expected frequency of the dataset? One of the important assumptions is that the two variables are independent, which means the variables do not influence each other. For independent variables, the statistical probability of any event involving both variables is calculated by multiplying the individual...
2.1K
Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence
3.4K
The test of independence is a chi-square-based test used to determine whether two variables or factors are independent or dependent. This hypothesis test is used to examine the independence of the variables. One can construct two qualitative survey questions or experiments based on the variables in a contingency table. The goal is to see if the two variables are unrelated (independent) or related (dependent). The null and alternative hypotheses for this test are:
H0: The two variables (factors)...
H0: The two variables (factors)...
3.4K
Introduction to Test of Independence
2.1K
In statistics, the term independence means that one can directly obtain the probability of any event involving both variables by multiplying their individual probabilities. Tests of independence are chi-square tests involving the use of a contingency table of observed (data) values.
The test statistic for a test of independence is similar to that of a goodness-of-fit test:
The test statistic for a test of independence is similar to that of a goodness-of-fit test:
2.1K
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
7.2K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.2K
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
107
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
107
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
76
Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.
76


