Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Factorial Design02:01

Factorial Design

12.8K
Factorial Analysis is an experimental design that applies Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistical procedures to examine a change in a dependent variable due to more than one independent variable, also known as factors. Changes in worker productivity can be reasoned, for example, to be influenced by salary and other conditions, such as skill level. One way to test this hypothesis is by categorizing salary into three levels (low, moderate, and high) and skills sets into two levels (entry level...
12.8K
Incentive Theory: Pull Theory of Motivation01:18

Incentive Theory: Pull Theory of Motivation

331
Incentive theory, or the "pull theory" of motivation, suggests that external rewards primarily drive behavior. Individuals are motivated to engage in activities when they anticipate a desirable outcome. This is why people often work hard for promotions or study intensively to achieve high grades. These incentives can be tangible, physical rewards such as money or promotions, or intangible, non-physical rewards like praise and social recognition.
The theory differentiates between...
331
Bias01:22

Bias

3.7K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
3.7K
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

22.9K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
22.9K
Persuasion Strategies01:52

Persuasion Strategies

38.2K
Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
38.2K
The Stanford Prison Experiment03:20

The Stanford Prison Experiment

22.8K
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
22.8K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Molecular community data meets anaerobic digestion Model 1 (ADM1) - a study about the correlation between metagenome-centric metaproteomics data of a two-step full-scale anaerobic digester and its corresponding mathematical model.

Water research·2026
Same author

The Omics Molecule Extractor: A Web Application for the Selection of Potential Biomarker Panels.

Journal of proteome research·2025
Same author

Critical Assessment of MetaProteome Investigation 2 (CAMPI-2): multi-laboratory assessment of sample processing methods to stabilize fecal microbiome for functional analysis.

Microbiome·2025
Same author

SBC-SHAP: Increasing the Accessibility and Interpretability of Machine Learning Algorithms for Sepsis Prediction.

The journal of applied laboratory medicine·2025
Same author

Edges are all you need: Potential of medical time series analysis on complete blood count data with graph neural networks.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Metaproteomics in the One Health framework for unraveling microbial effectors in microbiomes.

Microbiome·2025

相关实验视频

Updated: May 20, 2025

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
11:51

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making

Published on: March 2, 2011

15.0K

在软件工程实验中使用不同的金融激励计划的实验室实验.

Dmitri Bershadskyy1, Jacob Krüger2, Gül Calıklı3

  • 1Otto-von-Guericke Universität Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.

PeerJ. Computer science
|March 26, 2025
PubMed
概括

软件工程实验中的财务激励可以影响开发人员的表现. 这项研究探讨了三种方案,发现了潜在的影响,尽管由于样本大小而导致的结果并不显著.

关键词:
进行实验和试验.金融激励措施 金融激励措施软件工程 软件工程 软件工程

更多相关视频

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

5.9K
Interactive and Visualized Online Experimentation System for Engineering Education and Research
08:35

Interactive and Visualized Online Experimentation System for Engineering Education and Research

Published on: November 24, 2021

2.3K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: May 20, 2025

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
11:51

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making

Published on: March 2, 2011

15.0K
Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

5.9K
Interactive and Visualized Online Experimentation System for Engineering Education and Research
08:35

Interactive and Visualized Online Experimentation System for Engineering Education and Research

Published on: November 24, 2021

2.3K

科学领域:

  • 计算机科学 计算机科学
  • 软件工程 软件工程 软件工程
  • 经验研究是实证研究.

背景情况:

  • 实证软件工程研究往往涉及开发人员,但很少像其他科学领域一样使用财务激励.
  • 目前的指导方针建议激励主要是参与调查,而不是在实验中复制现实世界的动机.

研究的目的:

  • 调查不同金融激励计划对受控软件工程实验中的开发人员绩效的影响.
  • 弥合了解货币奖励如何影响参与者的行为和经验软件工程的结果的差距.

主要方法:

  • 对与开发商使用的现实世界金融激励进行了初步调查.
  • 设计和实施了三个不同的激励计划:性能依赖,性能独立和开源模仿.
  • 采用了跨主体实验设计来比较这些方案对参与者的表现的影响.

主要成果:

  • 初步发现表明,不同的金融激励计划可以影响参与者在软件工程实验中的表现.
  • 结果没有统计学意义,可能是由于样本规模较小和统计能力有限.
  • 观察到显著的趋势,为未来的研究和假设生成提供了潜在的方向.

结论:

  • 金融激励是软件工程实验中的一个重要因素,可能会影响开发人员的表现.
  • 了解这些影响对于设计更有效的实验和组织制定补偿策略至关重要.
  • 需要对更大的样本进行进一步的研究,以确认观察到的趋势并确定统计学意义.