Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

110
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
110
Bias01:22

Bias

3.7K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
3.7K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

112
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
112
Blinding01:11

Blinding

2.3K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
2.3K
Controls in Experiments01:13

Controls in Experiments

6.9K
When conducting an experiment, it is crucial to have control to reduce bias and accurately measure the dependent variables. It also marks the results more reliable. Controls are elements in an experiment that have the same characteristics as the treatment groups but are not affected by the independent variable. By sorting these data into control and experimental conditions, the relationship between the dependent and independent variables can be drawn. A randomized experiment always includes a...
6.9K
Blind Procedures02:07

Blind Procedures

10.6K
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which...
10.6K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Methodological Approaches to Real-World Evidence Generation for Glucagon-like Peptide-1-Based Therapies: Synopsis of a National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Workshop.

Annals of internal medicine·2026
Same author

Global Sensitivity Analysis for Studies Extending Inferences From a Randomized Trial to a Target Population.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Statins and risk of cardiovascular disease: Emulating a primary prevention trial in breast cancer survivors.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute·2026
Same author

Long-term effects of colonoscopy screening on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: a multicountry, population-based randomised controlled trial.

Lancet (London, England)·2026
Same author

Extending inferences from a randomized trial to trial-eligible and treatment-candidate target populations: examples of generalizability and transportability.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

The TARGET guideline for reporting observational studies of interventions.

Nature medicine·2026
Same journal

Notice of Retraction. Ren Y, et al. Personality Traits and Social Isolation in Older Adults. JAMA Netw Open. 2026;9(5):e269569.

JAMA network open·2026
Same journal

Error in Grant Number in Funding/Support Section.

JAMA network open·2026
Same journal

The Supplementary Role of Friends in Caregiving Networks.

JAMA network open·2026
Same journal

Urbanicity, Neighborhood Conditions, and Dementia Mortality.

JAMA network open·2026
Same journal

Equity and Cancer Survival Among Veterans Health Administration Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

JAMA network open·2026
Same journal

Limbic System Microstructure in Neonates With Antenatal Opioid Exposure.

JAMA network open·2026
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: May 20, 2025

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

411

单臂试验的定量偏差分析与外部控制武器

Alind Gupta1,2,3, Grace Hsu3, Seamus Kent4

  • 1Now with Inka Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

JAMA network open
|March 26, 2025
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

定量偏差分析 (QBA) 有助于评估单臂试验的外部控制臂 (ECA) 中未测量的混. 在先进的非小细胞肺癌分析中,QBA提高了危险比率估计的准确性.

更多相关视频

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.3K
Author Spotlight: Exploring the Impact of Reduced Resistance Exercise Volume on Metabolic Health
06:13

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Impact of Reduced Resistance Exercise Volume on Metabolic Health

Published on: December 1, 2023

1.0K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: May 20, 2025

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

411
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.3K
Author Spotlight: Exploring the Impact of Reduced Resistance Exercise Volume on Metabolic Health
06:13

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Impact of Reduced Resistance Exercise Volume on Metabolic Health

Published on: December 1, 2023

1.0K

科学领域:

  • 在瘤学瘤学.
  • 生物统计学 生物统计学
  • 医疗保健服务研究 医疗服务研究

背景情况:

  • 在单臂试验中,越来越多地使用来自观察数据的外部控制臂 (ECA).
  • 不测量的混对基于ECA的分析的有效性构成重大挑战.
  • 定量偏差分析 (QBA) 提供了一种方法来评估未测量的混的潜在影响.

研究的目的:

  • 评估QBA在使用ECA在非随机分析中对未测量混的敏感度的探讨中的实用性.
  • 将随机试验中的危险比率与模拟ECA分析中得出的危险比率进行比较.

主要方法:

  • 在高级非小细胞肺癌 (aNSCLC) 中使用随机试验数据和ECA模拟了15项治疗比较.
  • 在调整测量混因子后,进行了预先规定的QBA,合成了外部证据.
  • 在原始试验对照组和ECA衍生分析之间比较所有原因死亡的危险比率.

主要成果:

  • 与未调整 (0.247) 和测量混调整 (0.139) 分析相比,在QBA调整 (0.098) 时,日志危险比率估计的差异下降了.
  • 在QBA后,危险比率的比率为1.17,这表明与未调整 (1.36) 和测量混调整 (1.22) 分析相比,偏差减少.
  • QBA是可行的和有信息的,特别是当残留混是一个主要问题时.

结论:

  • QBA是评估ECA分析中偏差的一个有价值的工具,特别是在预期剩余混的环境中.
  • 这些发现支持进一步调查QBA在各种数据源和分析场景中的应用.
  • 使用QBA可以提高临床试验中从外部控制臂生成的证据的可靠性.