Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

10.7K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
10.7K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

73.1K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
73.1K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

1.4K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
1.4K
Distance Corrections01:15

Distance Corrections

24
To achieve precise distance measurements, especially in surveying and construction, certain corrections must be applied to account for potential sources of error like the standardization errors, temperature variations, and slope adjustments.Standardization error emerges when measurement equipment undergoes changes, such as wear, repairs, or weather impacts. To address this, surveyors compare the equipment’s readings to a standard. This process identifies any deviation that might lead to...
24
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

166
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
166
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

12.6K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
12.6K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

FAS-controlled T cells drive lymphoproliferation through glycolysis without effector differentiation.

Journal of human immunity·2026
Same author

Somatic STAT5B<sup>N642H</sup> mutations shape variable immune landscapes resulting in heterogenous immune diseases.

The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology·2025
Same author

A Machine-Learning-Based Approach to Informing Student Admission Decisions.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Novick Meets Bayes: Improving the Assessment of Individual Students in Educational Practice and Research by Capitalizing on Assessors' Prior Beliefs.

Educational and psychological measurement·2024
Same author

The Microbiome Modifies Manifestations of Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis in Perforin-Deficient Mice.

European journal of immunology·2024
Same author

Methodological aspects of the highly adaptive testing design for PISA.

Frontiers in psychology·2024

相关实验视频

Updated: May 23, 2025

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke
05:21

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Published on: January 7, 2019

5.7K

在计算机化适应性测试中对项目校准错误的计算.

Aron Fink1, Christoph König2, Andreas Frey2

  • 1Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor-W.-Adorno-Platz 6, 60323, Frankfurt, Germany. a.fink@psych.uni-frankfurt.de.

Behavior research methods
|March 27, 2025
PubMed
概括

计算机自适应测试 (CAT) 经常会因为项目参数错误而高估能力. 贝叶斯式方法有效地解决了这种不确定性,改善了能力估计,特别是当大规模校准样本不可行时.

科学领域:

  • 心理测量 心理测量 心理测量
  • 教育测量教育的测量
  • 统计建模 统计建模

背景情况:

  • 在计算机自适应测试 (CAT) 中,项目参数估计通常被视为固定的,忽视固有的校准错误.
  • 项目参数的不确定性可能导致低估标准错误和偏差的能力估计,特别是在极端的能力水平.

研究的目的:

  • 调查在CAT中计算项目参数不确定性的方法.
  • 为了比较测量误差建模和贝叶斯方法与标准CAT程序的性能.

主要方法:

  • 进行了一项蒙特卡洛模拟研究.
  • 研究了三种方法:两种测量误差建模技术和一种完全贝叶斯方法.
  • 这些方法基于能力估计的准确性和偏差性进行了比较.

主要成果:

  • 所有三种研究方法都减少了能力估计中的偏差和平均平方误差 (MSE),特别是在高项目校准误差条件下.
  • 与测量错误建模方法相比,贝叶斯式方法显示出更高的性能.
  • 对于具有极端能力水平的人来说,好处最为明显.

结论:

  • 考虑项目参数不确定性对于准确估计CAT能力至关重要.
关键词:
贝叶斯的技术贝叶斯的技术.校准错误是因为校准错误.计算机化的适应性测试项目响应理论.

更多相关视频

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

653
A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS
19:44

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS

Published on: June 3, 2009

13.6K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: May 23, 2025

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke
05:21

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Published on: January 7, 2019

5.7K
Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

653
A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS
19:44

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS

Published on: June 3, 2009

13.6K
  • 建议使用贝叶斯方法,因为它有效地减轻了偏差并提高了准确性.
  • 这种方法在大型校准样本不切实际的情况下特别有价值.