对参与和自治问卷 (IPA) 的影响:中风幸存者的中文版本的可靠性和有效性
Ya-Nan He1, Xiao-Huan Qin1, Jian-Hong Lv1
1Department of Nursing, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, People's Republic of China.
International journal of general medicine
|March 31, 2025
概括
中国对参与和自治影响问卷 (IPA-C) 是评估中风患者的可靠和有效工具. 这项研究证实了其适用于评估这一群体参与和自主性的适用性.
科学领域:
- 康复医学是康复的医学.
- 心理测量 心理测量 心理测量
- 神经学 神经学
背景情况:
- 脑卒中对患者的参与和自主性产生重大影响.
- 经过验证的仪器对于评估中风幸存者的这些影响至关重要.
- 对参与和自治的影响问卷 (IPA-E) 是一个成熟的工具,但中文版本 (IPA-C) 需要验证.
研究的目的:
- 评估影响参与和自治问卷 (IPA-C) 中文版本的可靠性和有效性.
- 建立IPA-C作为一个可靠的工具来评估中国中风患者的参与和自主性.
主要方法:
- 将 IPA-E 的语言验证转换为 IPA-C.
- 在421名首次中风患者的横截面研究中.
- 使用内部一致性 (克朗巴赫的α,分半) 和测试-重试来评估可靠性.
- 使用内容和构造有效性评估的有效性.
主要成果:
- IPA-C显示出高的内部一致性 (IPA-C-I的克朗巴赫α:0.962,IPA-C-II:0.823).
- 测试重复测试的可靠性很高,从0.915到0.975.5不等.
- 内容有效性指数为0.949,构造有效性显示了四个因素,占差异的82.918%.
结论:
- IPA-C是测量中风患者参与和自主性的有效和可靠的工具.
- 建议IPA-C作为研究人员评估中风幸存者的感知参与和问题的合适工具.
- 对于不同患者群体和文化背景,建议对IPA-C进行进一步的心理测量评估.
相关概念视频
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System I: Subjective Data
245
A thorough health history and physical assessment are essential for identifying cardiovascular disease (CVD) symptoms and distinguishing them from other health issues.
Initial Enquiry
Ask the patient about their primary concern and thoroughly explore all reported symptoms.
Medical History
Investigate past illnesses affecting the cardiovascular system, such as angina, anemia, rheumatic fever, congenital heart disease, stroke, thrombophlebitis, dysrhythmias, varicosities
Inquire about symptoms...
Initial Enquiry
Ask the patient about their primary concern and thoroughly explore all reported symptoms.
Medical History
Investigate past illnesses affecting the cardiovascular system, such as angina, anemia, rheumatic fever, congenital heart disease, stroke, thrombophlebitis, dysrhythmias, varicosities
Inquire about symptoms...
245
Reliability and Validity
12.6K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
12.6K


