Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model01:15

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model

546
The case management model is a multidisciplinary approach that involves healthcare professionals from diverse disciplines, such as physicians, nurses, therapists, social workers, and pharmacists, working collaboratively to address the various needs of patients. Each healthcare professional brings unique expertise and perspectives, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the patient's condition and tailoring treatment plans accordingly.
For example, a patient with a chronic...
546
Heuristics01:21

Heuristics

58
Heuristics are problem-solving strategies that use mental shortcuts to simplify decision-making. Unlike algorithms, which must be followed precisely to achieve a correct result, heuristics offer a general problem-solving framework. They save time and energy but can sometimes lead to less rational decisions.
People often rely on heuristics when faced with an overload of information, limited time, low importance of the decision, limited information, or when a heuristic readily comes to mind. For...
58
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

72
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
72
Critical Thinking II01:25

Critical Thinking II

2.7K
Critical thinking is a cognitive process with several attributes. The attributes of critical thinking include the following:
2.7K
Guidelines for Writing Outcome01:11

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

2.6K
When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
2.6K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

106
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
106

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Linking Minimally Important Differences (MID) and Acceptable Regret to Elicit Values and Preferences in Health Decision Models.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
Same author

GRADE Guidance: Update on Developing Good Practice Statements in Guidelines.

Annals of internal medicine·2026
Same author

Converting Evidence-Based Summary of Findings Evidence Tables Into Decision Analytical, Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALY) and Life Expectancies Metrics: A Tutorial.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2025
Same author

What is the probability that higher versus lower quality of evidence represents true effects estimates?

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2024
Same author

Improving methods of clinical practice guidelines: From guidelines to pathways to fast-and-frugal trees and decision analysis to develop individualised patient care.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2023
Same author

Decision curve analysis based on summary data.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2023
Same journal

Evaluating Restraint and Seclusion as Care Processes Rather Than Compliance Metrics.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
Same journal

Burden in Informal Caregivers of Palliative Care Patients With Pressure Injuries: Perceived Social Support and Influencing Factors Care Burden in Palliative Caregivers.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
Same journal

Organisational Problems, Role Stress, and Job Satisfaction Among Emergency Department Workers: A Multicenter Mixed-Effects Study.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
Same journal

Highlighting a Systemic Bias in the Responder Odds Ratio.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
Same journal

Epistemological Issues in Clinical Reasoning: A Scoping Review.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
Same journal

An Evaluation of AI-Generated Clinical Notes in the OpenNotes Era: A Thematic Analysis of Clinician Discourse.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: May 16, 2025

Author Spotlight: Developing a Point-of-Care Hemoglobin Estimation Method for Anemia Management
05:35

Author Spotlight: Developing a Point-of-Care Hemoglobin Estimation Method for Anemia Management

Published on: January 19, 2024

688

改善指导方针开发流程:整合证据估计和决策分析框架.

Benjamin Djulbegovic1, Iztok Hozo2, Ilkka Kunnamo3

  • 1Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Hematology and Oncology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice
|April 1, 2025
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

本研究引入了一种透明的决策分析模型,以改善临床指南的制定. 通过整合调查结果摘要表中的证据,它提高了卫生干预建议的可信度.

关键词:
贝叶斯统计学 贝叶斯统计学品位等级 品位等级 品位等级 品位等级决策分析 决策分析决策能力 决策能力基于证据的医学是基于证据的医学.经常客户统计数据.这些指导方针是指导方针.推断是指推断的结论.

更多相关视频

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

3.5K
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

11.7K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: May 16, 2025

Author Spotlight: Developing a Point-of-Care Hemoglobin Estimation Method for Anemia Management
05:35

Author Spotlight: Developing a Point-of-Care Hemoglobin Estimation Method for Anemia Management

Published on: January 19, 2024

688
Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

3.5K
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

11.7K

科学领域:

  • 卫生政策和研究方法论.
  • 临床决策和证据综合

背景情况:

  • 目前的指南制定,包括推,评估,开发和评估等级 (GRADE) 框架,依赖于面板的直观证据整合.
  • 这种依赖造成了"黑子"和"整合"问题,降低了临床实践指南的透明度和可信度.
  • 人力有限,无法处理总结结果 (SoF) 表中的大量数据,加剧了这些问题.

研究的目的:

  • 在准则制定中解决"黑子"和"整合"问题.
  • 提出一种透明和分析方法,将SoF表中的证据整合到决策中.
  • 通过一种新的方法,提高临床实践指南的可信度.

主要方法:

  • 利用人口,干预,比较,结果 (PICO) 格式作为 SoF 表的基础.
  • 综合频率主义或贝叶斯估计从SoF表与决策分析,考虑干预后果.
  • 匹配基于PICO的SoF表与决策模型,以计算竞争干预措施的预期效益 (ΔEU) 的净差异.

主要成果:

  • 成功将PICO框架与决策分析模型连接起来,以计算 ΔEU,用于比较干预措施的单一指标.
  • 该 ΔEU 度量提供了一个简单,透明和易于理解的评估竞争管理策略跨多个结果.
  • 基于 ΔEU 的决策模型可以在大约 10 分钟内完成,提供快速有效的分析.

结论:

  • 将简单透明的决策建模 (ΔEU) 纳入指导方针小组的流程可以提高直观的判断力.
  • 这种方法通过解决当前证据整合方法的局限性,导致更可靠的建议.
  • 倡导立即将 ΔEU 计算纳入系统审查和 SoF 表中,以提高指南的质量.