恐吓作为对社会科学保护研究的认识论暴力
Stasja Koot1,2, Nowella Anyango-van Zwieten3, Sian Sullivan4,5
1Sociology of Development and Change, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
概括
保护社会科学家面临着持续的恐吓,称为认识论暴力,以压制关键研究. 这种沉默阻碍了保护工作,学术自由和生物多样性保护中的社会正义.
科学领域:
- 保护 社会科学 保护 社会科学
- 生物多样性研究 生物多样性研究
- 环境正义 环境正义
背景情况:
- 社会科学家们为自然保护做出贡献,但在分析权力结构时面临阻力.
- 恐吓策略针对实地调查,出版和公开传播的研究结果.
- 不同的参与者,包括资助者和保护组织,可能会参与这些做法.
研究的目的:
- 调查和定义保护社会科学家所面临的恐吓.
- 引入"认识论暴力"的概念来描述这些沉默的做法.
- 分析恐吓对保护科学和实践的影响.
主要方法:
- 检查各种个人恐吓经历.
- 恐吓策略的分析,包括法律威胁,人格暗杀和工作排除.
- 识别参与压制研究的行为者及其动机.
主要成果:
- 恐吓有不同的形式,在研究过程的多个阶段发生.
- 认识论暴力是一种恐吓形式,抑制了批判性观点,阻碍了保护的有效性.
- 这种做法会对个人,保护社区和当地居民产生负面影响.
结论:
- 认识论性暴力对保护社会科学和学术完整性构成重大威胁.
- 解决恐吓问题对于推进有效,公正和协作保护至关重要.
- 保护关键研究对于一个运作良好的学术界和成功的保护成果至关重要.
关键词:
这是一个保护的保护.保护 保护 保护认识论上的暴力 认识论上的暴力现场工作 实地工作这是一种恐吓.恐吓是一种恐吓.社会科学研究的研究.有关素质的研究方法.发布 发布 发布 发布 发布出版物 出版物 出版物定性方法是一种定性方法.社会科学研究社会科学研究在野外工作.意识形态学上的暴力.更多相关视频
06:42Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
11.5K
05:03Author Spotlight: Unveiling Mechanisms of Stress Resilience - Significant Findings, Advancements, and Future Research
Published on: December 15, 2023
3.7K
相关概念视频
Robbers Cave
14.2K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.2K
Ethics in Research
22.9K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
22.9K
Deindividuation
26.1K
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
26.1K
Naturalistic Observations
15.3K
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
15.3K
Predator-Prey Interactions
16.0K
Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
16.0K
Social Proof
27.3K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.3K
