相关实验视频
Updated: May 16, 2025

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
Published on: June 21, 2010
评分器培训和学生临床判断的评估:一个实验调查
Deborah A Halliday1, Barbara J Patterson
1About the Authors Deborah A. Halliday, PhD, RN, is faculty, Moravian University, Helen S. Breidegam School of Nursing and Public Health, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania. This article is based on her doctoral research at Widener University. Barbara J. Patterson, PhD, RN, ANEF, FAAN, is interim dean, professor, and director, PhD Program, School of Nursing, Widener University, Chester, Pennsylvania. Dr. Patterson, editor of Nursing Education Perspectives, had no role in the peer review or acceptance of this article. For more information, contact Dr. Halliday at hallidayd@moravian.edu.
评审员培训对拉萨特临床判断表 (LCJR) 的评审员间可靠性进行了微小的改进,这表明需要在学生临床判断评估中使用专家基准.
科学领域:
- 护理教育 护理教育
- 临床判断评估 临床判断评估
- 医疗保健专业发展
背景情况:
- 在毕业前对护理学生的临床判断能力进行严格评估的需求日益增加.
- 准确评估学生临床表现的挑战.
- 对绩效评估的有效评级员培训策略的研究有限.
研究的目的:
- 评估评价者培训对评价者间可靠性的影响,使用拉萨特临床判断表 (LCJR).
- 与对照组相比,评估特定培训干预措施的有效性.
主要方法:
- 实验前后测试比较研究设计.
- 涉及34名护士教育工作者作为参与者.
- 使用拉萨特临床判断表 (LCJR) 作为评估工具.
主要成果:
- 与专家基准相比,评价员培训显示,评价员之间的可靠性得到了微小的改善.
- 训练有素和未训练有素 (对照组) 两组随着时间的推移经历了评分器衰减.
- 培训干预的有效性是有限的.
结论:
- 对学生的临床判断进行一致和公平的评估,需要有效的评价者培训.
- 建议在评估之前,专家评级人员建立明确的评级基准.
- 对最佳评级员培训方法的进一步研究是有必要的.
更多相关视频
10:26Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
Published on: September 11, 2021
09:52Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide
Published on: January 15, 2017
相关概念视频
Critical Thinking II
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
Critical Thinking I
Patient-centered Care
Naturalistic Observations