当被共党员包围时,道德化党派主义,而不是在混合公司中
Michalis Mamakos1, Tessa E S Charlesworth1, Eli J Finkel1,2
1Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, 2211 Campus Drive, Evanston, IL 60208, USA.
PNAS nexus
|April 11, 2025
概括
左翼 (LW) 和右翼 (RW) 的Reddit用户被研究为党派道德化. 与LW用户相比,RW用户在混合公司中表现出较弱的道德意识,特别是在非政治党派背景下.
科学领域:
- 社会心理学 社会心理学
- 计算语言学 计算语言学
- 政治科学 政治科学是指政治学.
背景情况:
- 党派人士经常认为他们的内部群体是道德的,而外部群体是不道德的.
- 了解政治意识形态如何影响道德语言的使用对于社会凝聚力至关重要.
- 之前的研究还没有在不同在线社会环境中广泛比较党派道德主义.
研究的目的:
- 调查左翼 (LW) 和右翼 (RW) Reddit用户之间的党派道德.
- 为了比较内部集团与混合公司在线环境中的道德化水平.
- 基于网络社区固有的政治性质,探索道德化的差异.
主要方法:
- 基于Reddit用户评论的四个词嵌入模型的开发,这些用户的评论来自ingroup和混合公司的背景.
- 在党派和道德的语义维度上对词语嵌入的评估.
- 党派和道德之间的相关性分析作为表达党派道德化的指标.
主要成果:
- 劳动力使用者在内部集团和混合公司环境中表现出一致的道德化的党派精神.
- 在混合公司中,RW用户的道德党派偏见较弱,相比于集团内设置和LW用户.
- RW用户在固有的政治子网中表现出比LW用户更强烈的道德化的党派精神,但在非政治党派背景中表现出类似的水平.
结论:
- 党派道德主义在政治意识形态和在线社会环境之间有所不同.
- 右翼用户的道德化更依赖于背景,特别是在混合公司环境中减少.
- 在道德化的党派主义中存在的不对称性表明,有不同的心理机制影响在线政治话语.
相关概念视频
Group Polarization
34.0K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
34.0K
In- and Out-Groups
38.6K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
38.6K
Stereotype Content Model
13.9K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
13.9K
Robbers Cave
14.2K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.2K
Groupthink
43.9K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
43.9K
Social Proof
27.2K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.2K


