Search research articles

关于 JoVE

概览领导团队博客 JoVE 帮助中心

作者

出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿

图书馆员

用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题

研究

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments 存档

教育

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual 教师资源中心教师网站

使用条款与条件

相关概念视频

Conserved Binding Sites

Conserved Binding Sites

Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序

Same author

Regulatory landscape of widespread stop codon readthrough in <i>Drosophila</i>.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same author

CD-CODE 2.0: an enhanced condensate knowledgebase integrating pathobiology, condensate modulating drugs, and host-pathogen interactions.

Nucleic acids research·2025

Same author

SHARK: web server for alignment-free homology assessment for intrinsically disordered and unalignable protein regions.

Nucleic acids research·2025

Same author

SHARK-capture identifies functional motifs in intrinsically disordered protein regions.

Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society·2025

Same author

PICNIC accurately predicts condensate-forming proteins regardless of their structural disorder across organisms.

Nature communications·2024

Same author

Characterization of alternative splicing during mammalian brain development reveals the extent of isoform diversity and potential effects on protein structural changes.

Biology open·2024

Search research articles

相关实验视频

Updated: May 13, 2025

In Vivo Functional Study of Disease-associated Rare Human Variants Using Drosophila

In Vivo Functional Study of Disease-associated Rare Human Variants Using Drosophila

Published on: August 20, 2019

深度学习工具预测了敏感度较低的无序区域中的变异.

Federica Luppino^1,2, Swantje Lenz^1,2, Chi Fung Willis Chow^1,2,3

¹Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Pfotenhauerstrasse 108, 01307, Dresden, Germany.

|April 12, 2025

概括

此摘要是机器生成的。

变异效应预测器在内在无序区域 (IDR) 中的突变的准确性较低. 需要新的方法来改善变异效应预测在这些关键的,但尚未结构化的蛋白质区域.

关键词:

阿尔法Missense的意思是错误的意思基准测试 (benchmarking) 是一种比较的方法.本质上是无序的地区.甲氨酸的开始地点变量效应预测器的变量效应预测器

更多相关视频

Screening for Functional Non-coding Genetic Variants Using Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay EMSA and DNA-affinity Precipitation Assay DAPA

Screening for Functional Non-coding Genetic Variants Using Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay EMSA and DNA-affinity Precipitation Assay DAPA

Published on: August 21, 2016

Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER

Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER

Published on: June 23, 2012

相关实验视频

Last Updated: May 13, 2025

In Vivo Functional Study of Disease-associated Rare Human Variants Using Drosophila

In Vivo Functional Study of Disease-associated Rare Human Variants Using Drosophila

Published on: August 20, 2019

Screening for Functional Non-coding Genetic Variants Using Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay EMSA and DNA-affinity Precipitation Assay DAPA

Screening for Functional Non-coding Genetic Variants Using Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay EMSA and DNA-affinity Precipitation Assay DAPA

Published on: August 21, 2016

Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER

Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER

Published on: June 23, 2012

科学领域:

基因组学就是基因组学.
生物信息学是一种生物信息学.
结构生物学结构生物学

背景情况:

AlphaFold2先进的3D蛋白质建模,帮助蛋白质设计和变异效应预测.
本质上无序的区域 (IDR) 缺乏稳定的结构,这对准确的建模和变量效应预测构成了挑战.
像AlphaMissense这样的当前变异效应预测器 (VEPs) 显示出高性能,但它们对IDR内的变异的有效性尚不清楚.

研究的目的:

对位于内在无序区域 (IDR) 的变异进行最先进的VEP的性能评估.
为了确定当前的VEP是否准确地预测IDR中的变异效应,与排序区域相比.

主要方法:

评估了VEPs的准确性,包括AlphaMissense和VARITY,对于有序和无序蛋白质区域的变异.
分析了IDR和有序区域变异之间的预测灵敏度和特异性差异.

主要成果:

变异性致病性预测在IDR中不如在有序区域中准确.
VEPs,特别是AlphaMissense和VARITY,对IDRs中突变的敏感性较低.
敏感性和特异性之间的性能差距在混乱区域的变体中是最大的.

结论:

现有的VEP显示了IDR变异的降低灵敏度和独特的性能概况.
需要新的IDR特征和预测模型来准确地对本质上有障碍的区域中的疾病突变进行分类.