为医疗保健专业人员开发日本版的Rushton道德弹性量表 (RMRS):评估可靠性和有效性
Keiko Wataya1,2, Masana Ujihara3, Yoshitaka Kawashima4
1Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Journal of nursing management
|April 14, 2025
概括
鲁什顿道德性度量 (RMRS) 的日本版本对医疗保健专业人员来说是可靠和有效的,尽管道德性的文化差异需要进一步研究.
科学领域:
- 医疗保健道德 医疗保健道德
- 心理测量 心理测量 心理测量
- 跨文化心理学 跨文化心理学
背景情况:
- 在医疗保健中,道德困难很常见,需要对道德痛苦和痛苦进行干预.
- 对于医疗保健专业人员来说,道德性至关重要,以应对道德挑战.
- 现有的尺度需要在不同的文化背景下进行验证.
研究的目的:
- 为了将Rushton道德性量表 (RMRS) 翻译成日语.
- 为验证日本RMRS在日本医疗保健专业人员中使用.
- 探索日本医疗保健中道德性的文化细微差别.
主要方法:
- 采用基于网络的问卷进行的横截面调查.
- 翻译和反译RMRS-16尺度的翻译和反译.
- 对1295名参与者进行了可靠性 (克朗巴赫α,ICC) 和有效性 (CFA) 分析.
主要成果:
- 日本的RMRS表现出可接受的可靠性,并支持原来的四因素结构.
- 护士和相关卫生专业人员在道德性方面的得分低于医生.
- 女性得分低于男性;ICC值表明潜在的子尺度不适合性.
- 建议在道德性方面存在文化差异,需要进一步的概念发展.
结论:
- 日本的RMRS通常是可靠和有效的,为评估道德性提供了实用性.
- 要解决结构性审查领域,需要对项目级别的分析.
- 建议在日本医疗保健中进行文化适应和进一步概念化道德性.
相关概念视频
Reliability and Validity
12.6K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
12.6K
Self-Report Tests of Personality
272
Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.
272
Nursing Evaluation
3.1K
The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
3.1K
Data Validation
4.8K
Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
4.8K
Lazarus's Cognitive Appraisal Theory
89
Cognitive psychologist Richard Lazarus proposed the cognitive-mediational theory of emotions, which emphasizes how individuals' assessments of stressors significantly affect their experience of stress. According to Lazarus, the stress response is determined by a two-step appraisal process: primary appraisal and secondary appraisal. These cognitive appraisals help individuals evaluate the potential impact of a stressor and determine the adequacy of their coping resources.
Primary Appraisal:...
Primary Appraisal:...
89
Nursing Assessment
7.0K
The two sources for collecting information are primary and secondary. After gathering information, interpretation and validation help to complete the data. The purpose of assessment is to establish data with the initial information, to interpret data about the patient's perceived needs and health problems, and to respond to these problems identified.
The nurse collects all aspects of the patient's health in the initial assessment, establishing priorities for ongoing focused assessments...
The nurse collects all aspects of the patient's health in the initial assessment, establishing priorities for ongoing focused assessments...
7.0K


