突出共同点的群体间心理干预可以增加批评声音的合法性
Lee Aldar1,2,3, Ruthie Pliskin4, Yossi Hasson5
1The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel. lee.aldar@mail.huji.ac.il.
Communications psychology
|April 16, 2025
概括
跨群体心理干预可以恢复批评政治声音的合法性. 突出共同的利益和价值观有效地提高了人们的认知合法性,有助于民主的弹性.
科学领域:
- 社会心理学 社会心理学
- 政治心理学 政治心理学
- 集团间关系 集团间关系
背景情况:
- 剥夺政治批评者的合法性在全球范围内威胁着民主.
- 跨群体心理干预为恢复合法性提供了一个潜在的解决方案.
研究的目的:
- 调查跨群体心理干预措施在合法化批评政治声音方面的有效性.
- 探索两种方法:基于共同点的重新分类和突出身份不一致.
主要方法:
- 一场涉及1691名犹太以色列的干预锦标赛.
- 使用混合效应模型对对照组测试几个干预措施.
- 干预的重点是共同的偏好,价值观,群体内认同,以及与非合法化态度的不一致.
主要成果:
- 两个干预措施显著提高了被剥夺合法性的集团的合法性.
- 这些有效的干预措施强调了共同的利益 (例如,社区支持,健康公平) 和价值观 (例如,人类尊严,正当程序).
结论:
- 突出共同利益和价值观的群体间心理干预可以成功地使批评声音合法化.
- 这些策略可以帮助放大不同意见,并抵制民主的倒退.
相关概念视频
Robbers Cave
14.2K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.2K
In- and Out-Groups
38.6K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
38.6K
Groupthink
43.9K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
43.9K
Social Proof
27.2K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.2K
Group Polarization
33.9K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
33.9K
Group Therapy
13
Group therapy is a sociocultural approach to psychological treatment, where individuals with shared psychological challenges come together under the guidance of a mental health professional. This therapeutic modality offers unique opportunities for individuals to connect, share, and grow within the context of a supportive group. By fostering mutual understanding and collaboration, group therapy can address a range of psychological concerns effectively, often complementing or surpassing the...
13


