反思能减轻COVID-19疫苗阴谋信念和犹吗?
Fatih Bayrak1, Emre Kayatepe2, Nagihan Özman2
1Department of Psychology, Baskent University, Ankara, Turkey.
Psychology & health
|April 21, 2025
概括
反思性思维没有直接影响疫苗的支持,但智力谦卑在一些人中增强了这种效果. 这突显了认知特征在健康危机期间导航阴谋论信仰中的作用.
科学领域:
- 心理学 心理学 心理学
- 认知科学 认知科学
- 公共卫生 公共卫生
背景情况:
- 社会动荡,就像COVID-19流行病一样,往往会放大阴谋论的信念,导致疫苗犹的增加.
- 针对疫苗阴谋论信仰的有效干预是有限的,因为认知过程未被充分探索.
- 三种理论预测反思的作用:加强现有的态度,提高准确性,或培养怀疑.
研究的目的:
- 调查反思对COVID-19阴谋信念和疫苗支持行为的影响.
- 检查反思如何影响支持疫苗,中立和疫苗犹的群体.
- 探索科学素养,智力谦卑和积极开放的思想对反思影响的温和效应.
主要方法:
- 一项实验性调查与1483名参与者利用开放科学实践和反射激活技术.
- 参与者根据疫苗的态度进行了细分 (支持疫苗,中立,疫苗犹).
- 对特定/通用COVID-19阴谋信念和疫苗支持行为进行反思的评估影响.
主要成果:
- 确认性分析发现没有直接支持关于反射影响的理论预测.
- 智力谦卑显著减轻了反思的效果,促进了高度智力谦卑的个体的疫苗支持行为.
- 这些发现强调了认知风格和先前的态度之间的复杂相互作用,以应对阴谋论的信念.
结论:
- 仅仅是反思性思维并没有直接影响疫苗支持行为.
- 对疫苗支持的反思产生了积极的影响,特别是在智力谦卑程度较高的人群中出现.
- 个人差异,特别是智力谦卑,对于塑造与信仰相关的结果和行为至关重要.
相关概念视频
01:51Vaccinations
43.0K
Overview
43.0K
01:31Confirmation Biases
5.4K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
5.4K
00:42Cross-reactivity
30.9K
Overview
30.9K
01:34Groupthink
43.9K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
43.9K
01:54The Placebo Effect
6.1K
The placebo effect occurs when people's expectations or beliefs influence or determine their experience in a given situation. In other words, simply expecting something to happen can actually make it happen.
6.1K
01:01Group Polarization
33.9K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
33.9K