因果关系,意义和沟通
Ari Beller1, Tobias Gerstenberg1
1Department of Psychology, Stanford University.
Psychological review
|April 21, 2025
概括
这项研究模拟了人们如何选择因果语言,如"引起"或"启用",来描述事件. 这些发现揭示了因果表达的层次结构,以及语境如何影响语言使用,影响听众的理解.
科学领域:
- 认知科学 认知科学
- 心理语言学 心理语言学
- 计算语言学 计算语言学
背景情况:
- 语言塑造了我们对事件和因果关系的理解.
- 以前的研究缺乏因果表达选择的计算模型.
研究的目的:
- 开发和测试因果表达式使用的计算模型.
- 调查演讲者如何选择因果语言,以及它如何影响听众的心理表现.
主要方法:
- 开发了一种结合因果表示,反事实模拟和实用推理的计算模型.
- 进行心理语言实验以验证模型的语义和实用性.
- 在演讲者和听者任务中对参与者的行为进行了测试.
主要成果:
- 因果表达形成了一种特异性的层次结构.
- 参与者可以根据这个层次结构做出务实的推断.
- 计算模型准确地预测了人类在因果语言任务中的行为.
结论:
- 该模型为理解因果关系中的语言-思想关系提供了一个新的框架.
- 语义和实用推理对于建模因果语言使用至关重要.
- 这项工作推进了研究人类认知和语言的计算方法.
更多相关视频
11:33Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Investigating Causal Brain-behavioral Relationships and their Time Course
Published on: July 18, 2014
42.9K
07:15Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation
Published on: January 16, 2019
10.9K
相关概念视频
Causality in Epidemiology
157
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
157
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
155
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
155
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I
135
The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
135
Cause and Effect
10.8K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
10.8K
Communication
5.3K
Sharing information, concepts, and emotions to foster mutual understanding is communication. The sender, recipient, and transaction must be considered in this manner. The sender is the person who shares the message, the recipient is the person who receives and understands the message, and the transaction is the method used to deliver the message and the variables that affect the communication's context and surroundings. The nurse-client connection is built on therapeutic communication.
5.3K
Correlation and Causation
37.2K
Statistical tests can calculate whether there is a relationship, or correlation, between independent and dependent variables. An indirect relationship of the variables signifies a correlation, while a direct relationship shows causation. If it is determined that no connection exists between the variables, then the correlation is a coincidence.
Correlation versus Causation
If the dependent variable increases or decreases when the independent variable increases, there is a positive or negative...
Correlation versus Causation
If the dependent variable increases or decreases when the independent variable increases, there is a positive or negative...
37.2K
