虚假的领导影响在高等教育机构 (HEI) 的组织破坏
Agnieszka Bieńkowska1, Katarzyna Tworek1
1Faculty of Management, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wrocław, Poland.
PloS one
|April 23, 2025
概括
高等教育机构 (HEI) 的虚假领导力通过侵蚀信任和工作表现来推动组织的破坏. 这种破坏性的领导风格需要采取主动措施来确保机构的完整性.
科学领域:
- 管理科学 管理科学
- 组织行为 组织行为
- 高等教育研究 高等教育研究
背景情况:
- 高等教育机构 (HEI) 的破坏性领导风格研究不足.
- 伪造的领导,以欺骗性的真实性为特征,对高等教育机构构成重大威胁.
- 了解组织破坏的机制对于机构的弹性至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 调查虚假领导对高等教育机构组织破坏的影响.
- 检查组织内部信任和工作表现的调解作用.
- 在毒性三角框架中引入分析虚假领导力的框架.
主要方法:
- 这是一项两步实证研究,涉及欧洲 (法国,波兰,西班牙,英国) 的529名高等教育机构员工.
- 使用线性回归与媒介来测试假设的定量分析.
- 应用有毒三角框架来理解领导力学动态.
主要成果:
- 假领导力显著和积极地预测了高等教育机构的组织破坏.
- 组织内部信任和工作绩效的下降调解了虚假领导和组织破坏之间的关系.
- 这项研究提供了经验证据,证明了虚假领导的有害影响.
结论:
- 假领导是一种独特的破坏性领导风格,有助于高等教育机构的组织衰退.
- 组织内部信任和工作表现下降是虚假领导造成伤害的关键途径.
- 建议包括促进道德领导,改进选拔流程,实施机构完整性的保障措施.
相关概念视频
Groupthink
43.9K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
43.9K
Deindividuation
26.0K
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
26.0K
Cognitive Dissonance
32.3K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
32.3K
The Stanford Prison Experiment
22.7K
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
22.7K
Robbers Cave
14.2K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.2K
Social Loafing
34.4K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
34.4K


