事实知识可以减少态度两极分化
Michael Nicholas Stagnaro1, Eran Amsalem2
1Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA. mnstag@mit.edu.
Nature communications
|April 23, 2025
概括
与普遍认为的相反,获得关于枪支管制等政治问题的事实知识可以减少态度两极分化. 这项研究发现,学习平衡的信息实际上会使个人走向更温和的观点.
科学领域:
- 政治科学 政治科学是指政治学.
- 心理学 心理学 心理学
- 信息传播 信息传播 信息传播
背景情况:
- 政治动机推理理论认为,事实知识增加了态度的两极分化.
- 个人经常选择性地接受与他们现有的信仰一致的信息.
- 现有数据将知识和两极分化联系起来是相关的,而不是因果关系的.
研究的目的:
- 实验测试增加事实知识对态度两极分化的因果关系.
- 调查暴露于支持和反对态度的事实如何影响政治态度.
- 确定任何观察到的对态度的影响是否会随着时间的推移而持久.
主要方法:
- 随机分配了1,011名参与者,接受关于枪支管制的事实信息.
- 包括支持和反对态度的事实,以鼓励平衡的学习.
- 为参与者学习提供的信息提供激励措施.
- 在信息暴露前和之后测量态度两极分化,随访一个月.
主要成果:
- 参与者表现出愿意参与并学习支持和反对他们最初的态度的事实.
- 越来越多的事实知识导致了可衡量的转向更温和的政策态度的转变.
- 这种对态度的缓和效应在干预后至少持续了一个月.
结论:
- 假设事实知识本质上增加了政治两极分化,可能是夸大了.
- 方向性推理对处理政治信息的影响可能比以前理论化的影响要小.
- 提供平衡的事实信息可以是减少态度两极分化的一个有效策略.
相关概念视频
Group Polarization
33.9K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
33.9K
Cause and Effect
10.8K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
10.8K
Attitudes
27.9K
Attitude is our evaluation of a person, an idea, or an object. We have attitudes for many things ranging from products that we might pick up in the supermarket to people around the world to political policies. Typically, attitudes are favorable or unfavorable: positive or negative (Eagly & Chaiken, 1993). And, they have three components: an affective component (feelings), a behavioral component (the effect of the attitude on behavior), and a cognitive component (belief and knowledge;...
27.9K
Stereotype Content Model
13.9K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
13.9K
Routes of Persuasion
63.4K
Persuasion is the process of changing our attitude toward something based on some kind of communication. Much of the persuasion we experience comes from outside forces. How do people convince others to change their attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors? What communications do you receive that attempt to persuade you to change your attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors?
63.4K
Fundamental Attribution Error
12.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
12.8K


