Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Falling short? Mitigating equity gaps and demographic bias in AI-driven molecular diagnostics.

Expert review of molecular diagnostics·2026
Same author

Atlas-based Multi-Parametric Quantitative Brain MRI Analysis of Children with Neurofibromatosis Type 1.

Clinical neuroradiology·2026
Same author

RetCond: A Conditional Diffusion Model for Self-Explanatory Multi-Class Fundus Image Classification.

Journal of medical systems·2026
Same author

The Relationship Between Inhibitory Control of Attention and fMRI Functional Connectivity in Children With and Without ADHD.

Journal of attention disorders·2026
Same author

Apathy in Mild Behavioural Impairment: Associations with Cortical Thickness and Grey Matter Volume.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Combining federated learning and travelling model boosts performance and opens opportunities for digital health equity.

NPJ digital medicine·2026

相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 19, 2026

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
14:27

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

15.6K

3D因果深度学习中的维度缩小用于神经图像生成:一项评估研究

Erik Y Ohara1,2, Vibujithan Vigneshwaran2, Raissa Souza1,2,3,4

  • 1University of Calgary, Biomedical Engineering Graduate Program, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)
|April 25, 2025
PubMed
概括

减小尺寸 (DR) 方法对反事实的神经图像产生产生影响. 三维主要组件分析 (3D PCA) 为神经成像分析中的因果深度学习模型提供了最佳平衡.

关键词:
有因果的人工智能.有关因果关系的因果关系深度学习是一种深度学习.减少维度,减少维度.生成型模型是一种生成型模型.规范化流动的流量.

更多相关视频

Three-Dimensional Shape Modeling and Analysis of Brain Structures
05:33

Three-Dimensional Shape Modeling and Analysis of Brain Structures

Published on: November 14, 2019

7.0K
Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain
05:55

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain

Published on: October 13, 2023

956

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jun 19, 2026

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
14:27

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

15.6K
Three-Dimensional Shape Modeling and Analysis of Brain Structures
05:33

Three-Dimensional Shape Modeling and Analysis of Brain Structures

Published on: November 14, 2019

7.0K
Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain
05:55

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain

Published on: October 13, 2023

956

科学领域:

  • 医学成像医学成像
  • 人工智能的人工智能是人工智能.
  • 神经科学是一个神经科学.

背景情况:

  • 使用规范化流程的因果深度学习 (DL) 为医学应用产生反事实图像,例如可解释性和in-silico研究.
  • 高分辨率的3D神经图像需要维度减小 (DR) 来实现计算效率高的DL模型训练.
  • 选择DR方法显著影响反事实神经图像生成的质量和可靠性.

研究的目的:

  • 为了比较各种DR技术对反事实神经图像生成的影响.
  • 在神经成像中确定因果DL应用的最佳DR方法.

主要方法:

  • 五种DR技术应用于23,692张3D大脑图像:二维PCA,2.5DPCA,3DPCA,自编码器和VQ-VAE.
  • 因果DL模型被训练在缩小尺寸数据上.
  • 卷积神经网络使用平均绝对误差 (MAE) 和分类准确度评估了反事实图像中的年龄和性别变化.

主要成果:

  • 2.5D PCA为年龄变化产生了最低的MAE (4.16).
  • 自动编码器嵌入实现了最高的性别分类准确性 (97.84%),但将年龄MAE增加到5.24.
  • 在改变年龄时,3D PCA显示出平衡的性能,年龄MAE为4.57,性别分类准确度为94.01%,在改变性别时年龄MAE为3.84,准确度为94.73%.

结论:

  • 3D PCA是最适合用于因果神经图像分析的DR方法.
  • 选择DR技术对神经成像中的因果DL模型的性能产生了重大影响.
  • 3D PCA在准确性和效率之间提供了强大的平衡,用于生成可靠的反事实神经图像.