发展,验证和可靠性 运动官员 (IBSSO) 的非理性信念尺度 (IBSSO)
Stuart C Carrington1, Martin James Turner2, Jamie S North1
1Faculty of Sport, Technology and Health Science, St Mary's University, Twickenham, London, United Kingdom.
Frontiers in psychology
|April 25, 2025
概括
这项研究开发并验证了体育官员非理性信念尺度 (IBSSO) 来衡量运动员的非理性信念. IBSSO是一个可靠和有效的工具,用于评估体育官员的认知扭曲.
科学领域:
- 心理学 心理学 心理学
- 运动科学 运动科学 运动科学
- 认知行为疗法是认知行为疗法.
背景情况:
- 理性情绪行为疗法 (REBT) 在绩效环境中的应用正在增长.
- 对于体育官员等人群中的非理性信念,需要采取具体措施.
- 体育官员面临着影响表现的独特心理压力.
研究的目的:
- 开发和验证体育官员 (IBSSO) 的非理性信念尺度.
- 为评估体育官员的非理性信念提供可靠和有效的工具.
- 为了促进REBT在体育裁判中的应用.
主要方法:
- 项目开发基于不合理的绩效信念库存 (iPBI).
- 通过专家,新手和行业小组进行改进.
- 使用探索性和确认性因子分析,并发性和收性有效性评估,以及对体育官员样本的测试复试可靠性测试进行验证.
主要成果:
- 一个16项,IBSSO的四因素模型证明了可接受的统计和理论合适.
- IBSSO显示了与相关措施 (并发有效性) 和iPBI (收有效性) 的正相关性.
- 该秤表现出良好的测试-重新测试可靠性,证实了其随时间的稳定性.
结论:
- 体育官员非理性信念尺度 (IBSSO) 是一种心理测量学上合理的衡量标准.
- IBSSO可以用来评估对体育官员的非理性信念.
- 建议与体育官员进行进一步的研究,以调查REBT的有效性.
相关概念视频
Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy
26
Cognitive-behavioral therapies (CBTs) are grounded in the belief that our thoughts profoundly influence our emotions and actions. Advocates of CBT emphasize three core assumptions: first, that cognitions are identifiable and measurable; second, that they are central to psychological functioning; and third, that irrational or maladaptive beliefs can be replaced with rational and adaptive ones. This transformative approach to therapy has paved the way for specific models such as Albert...
26
Self-Report Tests of Personality
268
Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.
268
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
89.6K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
89.6K
Reliability and Validity
12.6K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
12.6K
Robbers Cave
14.2K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.2K
Measures of Intelligence
5.0K
Psychologists measure intelligence by using standardized tests that produce a score known as the intelligence quotient or IQ. To understand IQ tests, it's important to recognize the key principles behind their construction: validity, reliability, and standardization.
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this;...
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this;...
5.0K


