如何在一次性公共产品游戏中选择领导者:实验室证据
Shuo Xu1, Wenhao Zhang2, Jie Zheng2,3
1International Business School, Beijing Foreign Studies University, Beijing 100089, China.
Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)
|April 26, 2025
概括
引入公共物品供应实验的领导地位并没有增加贡献. 志愿领导是最不有效的,但随机选择的志愿领导人显示了鼓励合作的希望.
科学领域:
- 行为经济学是一种行为经济学.
- 实验经济学的实验经济学
- 游戏理论 游戏理论
背景情况:
- 公共产品的提供对于社会福祉至关重要.
- 了解影响合作的因素对于有效的资源管理至关重要.
- 领导人选择机制可能会影响群体行为和结果.
研究的目的:
- 实验性地研究不同领导层选择机制对公共产品供应的影响.
- 识别哪些领导结构促进或阻碍群体中的合作行为.
- 评估内源与外源领导人选择的有效性.
主要方法:
- 与人类参与者进行受控实验室实验.
- 实施各种领导人选择协议 (例如,自愿,随机选择).
- 在不同的领导条件下,衡量个人对公共利益的贡献水平.
主要成果:
- 引入领导力并没有显著增加对公共利益的总体贡献.
- 自愿的领导层选择导致了最低的贡献水平.
- 随机选择志愿领导人成为一个有前途的机制,表明合作意图并减轻自由骑行.
结论:
- 仅仅引入领导力并不能保证改善公共产品的提供.
- 领导人选择的方法至关重要;自愿选择可能会产生反作用.
- 内生领导人选择,特别是通过随机分配自愿候选人,可以通过信号承诺和减少自由骑行激励措施,有效地促进合作.
相关概念视频
Robbers Cave
14.2K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.2K
Group Design
8.8K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.8K
Social Proof
27.2K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.2K
Social Loafing
34.4K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
34.4K
The Stanford Prison Experiment
22.7K
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
22.7K
Randomized Experiments
6.6K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
Simple randomization
Simple...
6.6K


