答案证明在多选项测试中的作用:对表现和元认知准确性的影响
Spenser A Clark1, Michelle L Rivers2, Acacia L Overono3
1Department of Instructional Technology & Learning Sciences, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA.
Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)
|April 26, 2025
概括
在多选题测试中添加答案证明,可以显著提高学生的成绩,并有助于学习. 这种简单的改变增强了主动检索,提高了测试成绩和潜在的元认知准确性.
科学领域:
- 认知心理学 认知心理学
- 教育心理学教育心理学
- 学习科学 学习科学
背景情况:
- 多选项 (MC) 测试是常见的,但因为促进被动识别而不是积极检索而受到批评.
- 超认知判断对测试绩效的影响需要进一步研究.
研究的目的:
- 调查在MC考试中要求答案证明如何影响学生的成绩.
- 探索答案证明对元认知准确性的影响.
主要方法:
- 两项实验是对大学生进行的,他们正在学习教科书中的一章.
- 参与者完成了标准的MC测试或MC测试,并证明了他们的答案.
- 收集了超认知判断 (预测和后判断).
主要成果:
- 答案证明组在即时测试 (实验1和2) 中显著优于仅MC组.
- 答案证明组在延迟测试 (实验2) 中的得分数量较高.
- 最初的证据表明,测试类型可能会影响元认知准确性,这需要进一步的研究.
结论:
- 答案证明通过促进详细的检索,加强记忆回忆来增强学习.
- 将答案证明纳入MC测试可以提高学习和元认知准确性.
- 虽然对绩效有好处,但与标准MC测试相比,答案证明增加了时间成本.
更多相关视频
12:55Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
Published on: September 27, 2020
8.3K
10:26Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
Published on: September 11, 2021
3.8K
相关概念视频
Metacognition
115
Metacognition is a conscious process where individuals are aware of their cognitive and executive processes, such as planning before solving a problem or self-monitoring during reading. For instance, a writer may need help with composing a piece. The situation involves a writer who is working on a piece of writing, but while doing so, they realize that something is missing. They notice that their characters lack depth or details. This realization occurs because the writer is reflecting on their...
115
Fundamental Attribution Error
12.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
12.8K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
153
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
153
Hindsight Biases
3.4K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
3.4K
Reliability and Validity
12.6K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
12.6K
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
38.6K
People can go to great lengths to protect their self-image and present themselves in ways that they want others to see them. Sociologist Erving Goffman presented the idea that a person is like an actor on a stage. Calling his theory dramaturgy, Goffman believed that we use “impression management” to present ourselves to others as we hope to be perceived. Each situation is a new scene, and individuals perform different roles depending on who is present (Goffman, 1959). Think about...
38.6K
