相关实验视频

Updated: May 10, 2025

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View

Published on: January 7, 2019

用于评估初级混合方法或多方法研究的方法质量的工具:范围审查协议

Cindy Stern¹, Heather Loveday², Christina Godfrey³

¹JBI, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

JBI evidence synthesis

|April 28, 2025

概括

本范围审查确定了评估混合方法研究的工具. 它的目的是寻找能够评估多方法研究中的方法质量和偏差风险的工具.

科学领域:

方法论方法论方法论
研究质量评估研究质量评估
混合方法研究研究研究混合方法

背景情况:

乔安娜·布里格斯研究所 (JBI) 目前缺乏用于初级混合方法或多方法研究的专门评估工具.
现有的JBI建议涉及使用单独的定性和定量工具,这些工具可能无法完全捕捉混合方法研究的细微差别.

研究的目的:

识别和描述可用的工具,以批判性地评估初级混合方法或多方法研究的方法质量.
通过使用已识别的评估工具,评估这些研究中的偏差风险.
确定这些工具是否进行了任何正式的心理测量评估.

主要方法:

根据JBI方法进行全面的范围审查,并使用PRISMA-ScR指南进行报告.
搜索将在多个数据库 (如PubMed,Scopus,CINAHL) 和其他资源中进行,没有语言限制.
数据的提取和分析将涉及两个独立的审查员,利用描述性统计,内容分析和叙事合成.

主要成果:

本节将详细介绍所识别的评估工具,它们的特征和心理测量属性.
结果将使用描述性统计数据,表格和图表来概括发现.
该审查将概述混合方法研究评估工具的当前环境.

结论:

该审查将为混合方法研究开发适当的评估工具提供信息.
结果将指导研究人员选择合适的工具来评估混合方法研究的质量.
这项工作解决了复杂研究设计的方法学评估中的一个关键差距.

关键词:

批判性评价批判性的评价方法论质量方法论质量混合方法混合方法.质量评估质量评估的质量评估.偏见的风险偏见的风险

更多相关视频

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI

Published on: November 27, 2019

相关概念视频

Cochran's Q Test

Cochran's Q Test

Cochran's Q Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there are potential differences in the outcomes of three or more related groups on a binary (yes/no) or dichotomous outcome. It is essentially an extension of the McNemar Test, which is limited to two related samples - Cochran's Q test can handle three or more related samples, making it more versatile in scenarios where subjects are measured under multiple conditions. The test statistic follows a Chi-Square...

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...

Data Validation

Data Validation

Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.