Search research articles

关于 JoVE

概览领导团队博客 JoVE 帮助中心

作者

出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿

图书馆员

用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题

研究

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments 存档

教育

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual 教师资源中心教师网站

使用条款与条件

相关概念视频

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序

Same author

Morphogenetic Expression of Genes in Class II Division 2 Malocclusion: A Pedigree Study.

Cureus·2025

Same author

Temporary Anchorage Device: A Narrative Review.

Cureus·2025

Same author

Finite element study of the efficacy of three different loops for bodily protraction of the mandibular molar.

Scientific reports·2025

Same author

Comparative Evaluation of Bone Anatomy for Ramal Implant Placement and Proximity to the Inferior Alveolar Canal in Different Facial Divergence to Assess the Ideal Site of Placement: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study.

Cureus·2025

Same author

Effectiveness of Different Etching Agents on Enamel Surface and Shear Bond Strength: An In Vitro Evaluation.

Cureus·2024

Same author

Removable versus fixed myo-functional appliances in class II malocclusion among Indians.

Bioinformation·2024

Search research articles

相关实验视频

Updated: May 9, 2025

Author Spotlight: Insights into an Efficient Murine Maxillary Orthodontic Model Protocol

Author Spotlight: Insights into an Efficient Murine Maxillary Orthodontic Model Protocol

Published on: October 27, 2023

自结合式与传统括号:叙述性审查

Manvi A Arora¹, Alap Shah¹, Dhaval Somani²

¹Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Karnavati School of Dentistry, Ahmedabad, IND.

|May 1, 2025

概括

此摘要是机器生成的。

自结合支架 (SLB) 在正牙治疗中比传统支架 (CB) 有一些优势. 然而,目前的研究表明,在主要治疗结果方面,SLBs并没有显著优于CBs.

关键词:

传统的支架是传统的支架.费用费用费用费用费用效率效率效率效率效率效率效率摩擦摩擦摩擦摩擦自结合式支架自结合式支架扭矩表达方式扭矩表达方式

更多相关视频

Force System with Vertical V-Bends: A 3D In Vitro Assessment of Elastic and Rigid Rectangular Archwires

Force System with Vertical V-Bends: A 3D In Vitro Assessment of Elastic and Rigid Rectangular Archwires

Published on: July 24, 2018

Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment

Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment

Published on: February 23, 2024

相关实验视频

Last Updated: May 9, 2025

Author Spotlight: Insights into an Efficient Murine Maxillary Orthodontic Model Protocol

Author Spotlight: Insights into an Efficient Murine Maxillary Orthodontic Model Protocol

Published on: October 27, 2023

Force System with Vertical V-Bends: A 3D In Vitro Assessment of Elastic and Rigid Rectangular Archwires

Force System with Vertical V-Bends: A 3D In Vitro Assessment of Elastic and Rigid Rectangular Archwires

Published on: July 24, 2018

Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment

Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment

Published on: February 23, 2024

科学领域:

矯正牙科矯正牙科是一種矯正牙科.
生物材料科学生物材料科学
牙科技术牙科技术

背景情况:

ортодонтика支架技术的进步旨在提高治疗效率,患者舒适度和口腔卫生.
自结括号 (SLBs) 是作为传统括号 (CBs) 的替代品提出的,其所谓的好处包括减少摩擦和处理时间.
支持SLBs对CBs优势的临床证据仍然没有确定性,需要进一步调查.

研究的目的:

对最近的研究进行叙述性审查,比较自结括号 (SLB) 和常规括号 (CB).
分析生物力学,治疗持续时间,患者舒适度,牙周健康,临床效率,成本效益和长期稳定性的差异.
评估与SLBs与CBs相关的整体临床疗效和患者结局.

主要方法:

使用最近的研究文章进行了全面的文献搜索.
审查的重点是研究生物力学特性,临床结果和患者报告的数据.
在各种治疗参数中对SLBs和CBs进行了比较分析.

主要成果:

虽然SLB可以提供某些优势,例如潜在的较低摩擦,但缺乏明显优势的明确证据.
治疗持续时间,患者舒适度和牙周健康结果显示SLBs和CBs之间的结果是混合的.
在比较SLB和CB时,在关键治疗结果中没有发现任何实质性的差异.

结论:

自结括号 (SLB) 在正牙治疗中有一些好处,但在主要的临床结果中没有显示出比传统括号 (CB) 具有统计学意义的优势.
在SLB和CB之间做出选择可能取决于特定的临床场景和患者因素,而不是SLB的普遍优异性能.
需要进一步进行高质量的临床试验,以确定SLB与CB相比的长期疗效和成本效益.