为社会利益设计社交媒体内容推算法
Jana Lasser1,2, Nikolaus Poechhacker1,3
1IDea_Lab, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
|May 5, 2025
概括
本研究建议设计社交媒体算法,以促进健康的公民话语和民主价值观,平衡个人表达与社会福祉. 它为内容推系统提供了一种新的方法.
科学领域:
- 社会科学 社会科学 社会科学
- 计算机科学 计算机科学
- 法律 法律 法律 法律
背景情况:
- 社交媒体平台与两极化和错误信息等社会危害有关.
- 当前的内容推算法可能会加剧这些问题.
- 需要算法优先考虑社会利益和民主话语.
研究的目的:
- 倡导为社会利益而设计的替代内容推算法.
- 探索如何培养健康的公民话语可以指导算法开发.
- 将内容建议与民主价值观和欧盟数字服务法案保持一致.
主要方法:
- 采用公民话语镜头来识别算法的相关性维度.
- 检查内容推干预和言论自由之间的权衡.
- 提出一个研究议程,利用多利益相关者度量构建和风险评估.
主要成果:
- 确定了设计支持公民话语的算法的关键维度.
- 探索言论自由与社会结果之间的复杂平衡.
- 概述了实现权利和社会影响之间的情况依赖平衡的框架.
结论:
- 可以设计替代内容推算法,以促进更健康的公共领域.
- 将算法与民主价值观和监管框架 (例如数字服务法案) 保持一致至关重要.
- 需要进一步的研究来平衡个人自由与数字空间中的集体社会福祉.
相关概念视频
Stereotype Content Model
13.9K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
13.9K
Social Proof
27.2K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.2K
Social Exchange Theory
34.0K
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
34.0K
Group Polarization
33.9K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
33.9K
Social Scripts
9.4K
People tend to know what behavior is expected of them in specific, familiar settings. A script is a person’s knowledge about the sequence of events expected in a specific setting (Schank & Abelson, 1977). Essentially, scripts are a particular kind of schema, one containing default values for the features within an event. In the restaurant example, the script's features include the props (e.g., tables, menu, food, and money), the roles to be played (e.g., customer and waiter),...
9.4K
Social Loafing
34.3K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
34.3K


