[上肢WMSD及其不利的人体工程学因素的结构方程分析和建模]
1Occupational Health Surveillance Center, Guangzhou Institute of Occupational Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou 510620, China.
概括
这项研究表明,上肢工作姿势和个人因素直接影响与工作相关的肌肉骨疾病 (WMSDs),疲劳作为关键调解者. 有效的预防需要解决导致WMSDs的组织和职业特定因素.
科学领域:
- 职业健康 职业健康 职业健康
- 流行病学 流行病学
- 人体工程学就是人体工程学.
背景情况:
- 与工作相关的肌肉骨疾病 (WMSDs) 是中国一个重要的职业健康问题.
- 了解风险因素的复杂相互作用对于有效的预防策略至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 调查上肢WMSD与中国职业人口中各种风险因素之间的结构关系.
- 为预防和控制WMSDs开发一个结构方程模型.
主要方法:
- 一项全国性的调查,使用中国肌肉骨疾病电子问卷.
- 结构方程建模 (SEM) 来分析六个提取的因素之间的关系:工作组织,工作类型,上肢工作姿势,个人因素,上肢疲劳和上肢WMSDs.
主要成果:
- 上肢WMSD和疲劳的发生率分别为24.44%和43.76%.
- 上肢工作姿势和个人因素对WMSDs产生了直接影响.
- 上肢疲劳显著调解了工作组织,工作类型,工作姿势和WMSD之间的关系,间接影响比直接影响更为重要.
结论:
- 预防和控制上肢WMSD必须考虑上肢肌肉疲劳的调解作用.
- 针对工作组织,工作类型和上肢工作姿势的综合方法对于改善预防和控制水平至关重要.
更多相关视频
05:28Author Spotlight: Enhancing Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Stroke Patients Through Advanced Robotic and Neuromodulation Technologies
Published on: October 11, 2024
426
08:45Kinematic Analysis Using 3D Motion Capture of Drinking Task in People With and Without Upper-extremity Impairments
Published on: March 28, 2018
10.5K
相关概念视频
Machines: Problem Solving II
263
Machines are complex structures consisting of movable, pin-connected multi-force members that work together to transmit forces. Consider a lifting tong carrying a 100 kg load. It comprises movable sections DAF and CBG linked together with member AB.
263
Applications of Stress
224
Consider a structure made of a boom and a rod designed to support a load. These two components are connected by a pin and stabilized by brackets and pins. The boom and the rod are detached from their supports to assess the different stresses imposed on this structure, and a free-body diagram is drawn. Then, all the forces applied, including the load acting on the structure, are identified. The reaction forces exerted on both the boom and the rod are computed using the equilibrium equations.
The...
The...
224
Rigid Body Equilibrium Problems - II
6.8K
A rigid body is in static equilibrium when the net force and the net torque acting on the system are equal to zero.
Consider two children sitting on a seesaw, which has negligible mass. The first child has a mass (m1) of 26 kg and sits at point A, which is 1.6 meters (r1) from the pivot point B; the second child has a mass (m2) of 32 kg and sits at point C. How far from the pivot point B should the second child sit (r2) to balance the seesaw?
Consider two children sitting on a seesaw, which has negligible mass. The first child has a mass (m1) of 26 kg and sits at point A, which is 1.6 meters (r1) from the pivot point B; the second child has a mass (m2) of 32 kg and sits at point C. How far from the pivot point B should the second child sit (r2) to balance the seesaw?
6.8K
