剥削性的领导如何破坏下属的负责行为? 一个调节的调解模型
Lingnan Kong1, Sha Liu1, Lu Liu2
1School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, No. 2, Bei Nong Road, Changping District, Beijing, 102206, China.
BMC psychology
|May 6, 2025
概括
剥削的领导力损害了员工的倡议,但组织认同可以调解这种效应. 高度的传统性可能缓冲负面影响,保护主动行为.
科学领域:
- 组织行为 组织行为
- 领导力研究 领导力研究
- 社会心理学 社会心理学
背景情况:
- 负面的领导力,特别是剥削的领导力,显著影响员工的行为.
- 员工积极的行为对于组织的创新和增长至关重要.
- 了解剥削型领导对这些行为的影响是必不可少的.
研究的目的:
- 调查剥削性领导对下属负责行为的影响.
- 检查组织识别的调解作用.
- 探索传统在这种关系中的调节作用.
主要方法:
- 对348名来自中国各行各业的员工进行了两阶段的调查.
- 收集了横截面数据.
- 使用带有潜变量的结构方程模型来测试假设.
主要成果:
- 剥削性的领导力会对负责人行为产生负面影响.
- 组织识别介绍了剥削领导和负责行为之间的关系.
- 传统调节了这些关系,削弱了剥削领导的负面影响.
结论:
- 剥削的领导力削弱了员工的倡议,组织认同发挥了关键的调解作用.
- 传统性可以通过加强对权威的坚持来减轻剥削领导的不利影响.
- 结果为管理剥削性领导和培养积极主动的员工行为提供了实际见解.
相关概念视频
Social Loafing
34.4K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
34.4K
Parenting Styles
45
Diana Baumrind's four parenting styles — authoritarian, authoritative, neglectful, and permissive — each influence children's socio-emotional development differently.
Authoritarian Parenting
This style is strict and controlling, with little room for open dialogue. Authoritarian parents demand obedience and often enforce rules with minimal warmth. Children raised this way may lack social skills and initiative, usually comparing themselves to others unfavorably.
Authoritative...
Authoritarian Parenting
This style is strict and controlling, with little room for open dialogue. Authoritarian parents demand obedience and often enforce rules with minimal warmth. Children raised this way may lack social skills and initiative, usually comparing themselves to others unfavorably.
Authoritative...
45
Fundamental Attribution Error
12.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
12.8K
Groupthink
43.9K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
43.9K
Obedience
32.5K
According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation,...
32.5K
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
38.6K
People can go to great lengths to protect their self-image and present themselves in ways that they want others to see them. Sociologist Erving Goffman presented the idea that a person is like an actor on a stage. Calling his theory dramaturgy, Goffman believed that we use “impression management” to present ourselves to others as we hope to be perceived. Each situation is a new scene, and individuals perform different roles depending on who is present (Goffman, 1959). Think about...
38.6K


