一个谎言是什么? 研究人员如何判断欺骗的合理性
Kamiel Verbeke1, Tomasz Krawczyk2, Dieter Baeyens3
1PhD student in bioethics at the Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law at KU Leuven in Belgium; After the writing of this manuscript, he joined the European Research Council as an Ethics Officer.
Ethics & human research
|May 7, 2025
概括
研究人员需要更明确的伦理准则,用于在研究中使用欺骗. 这项研究确定了欺骗方法及其社会背景的关键特征,以改善涉及欺骗的研究的伦理评估.
科学领域:
- 心理学 心理学 心理学
- 研究伦理学研究伦理学
- 社会科学 社会科学 社会科学
背景情况:
- 目前的研究伦理指南为评估欺骗性研究的合理性提供了有限的支持.
- 现有的指导方针缺乏对欺骗性研究方法的伦理相关特征的准确描述.
研究的目的:
- 识别和描述欺骗性研究方法的伦理相关特征.
- 为研究人员和伦理审查者提供有关欺骗的改进伦理指导的发展信息.
主要方法:
- 采访了24位在研究中使用欺骗的不同研究人员.
- 分析了采访数据,以确定欺骗行为,参与者的信念形成和欺骗诱导的经验的特征.
- 检查了社会背景的伦理相关性,包括欺骗者与参与者的关系和社区因素.
主要成果:
- 研究人员确定了欺骗行为的关键特征 (例如,虚假信息,灵活性) 以及它们对参与者的影响.
- 参与者的信念形成 (可信度,怀疑) 和欺骗诱导的经验 (同意有效性,负面价值) 被强调为与伦理相关的.
- 社会背景,包括研究者与参与者的关系和社区,显著影响欺骗的伦理正当性.
结论:
- 在研究中对欺骗的更细致的理解需要考虑特定的方法论,经验和上下文特征.
- 这项研究为更连贯,更准确地评估欺骗性研究实践的伦理合理性提供了框架.
- 调查结果可以指导为涉及欺骗的研究创建更有效和实用的伦理审查标准.
相关概念视频
Ethics in Research
22.8K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
22.8K
Deindividuation
26.0K
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
26.0K
Social Proof
27.2K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.2K
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
5.1K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
5.1K
Robbers Cave
14.2K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.2K
Naturalistic Observations
15.3K
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
15.3K


