加强直肠测量测试的标准化:国家立场论文的影响
Yoav Mazor1, Amir Mari2, Joseph Lysy3
1Department of Gastroenterology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa.
European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology
|May 13, 2025
概括
一份国家立场论文和教育改善了以色列门测量 (ARM) 和气球驱逐测试 (BET) 的标准化. 实践与国际指导方针保持一致,尽管BET的一些变化仍然存在.
科学领域:
- 胃肠病学 胃肠病学
- 生理学 生理学 生理学
- 医疗实践标准化 医疗实践标准化
背景情况:
- 2019年伦敦分类为门测量 (ARM) 和气球驱逐测试 (BET) 制定了标准.
- 在临床实践中采用这些国际指导方针并未得到充分理解.
- 这项研究评估了以色列目前的ARM和BET实践,以及它们与伦敦分类的一致性.
研究的目的:
- 评估以色列直肠测量和气球驱逐测试实践.
- 为了识别与2019年伦敦分类的偏差.
- 测量国家立场文件对这些程序标准化的影响.
主要方法:
- 2020年底对95%的以色列ARM中心的胃肠科医生进行了一项调查,该调查于2020年底进行.
- 一个国家工作组根据国际建议制定了立场文件.
- 在一项后续调查中,评估了立场文件和教育课程实施一年后的实践变化.
主要成果:
- 最初的调查显示了ARM和BET的实践差异很大,包括不一致的伦敦分类的使用和缺乏标准化的参考值.
- 在立场论文和教育之后,87%的中心采用了标准化的报告和统一的测试执行.
- 尽管有了改进,但气球驱逐测试技术的变化仍然存在,例如气球类型和患者定位.
结论:
- 一份国家立场论文和教育举措显著改善了以色列直肠测量和气球驱逐测试的标准化.
- 这些干预措施证明了有针对性的政策和教育在使临床实践与国际准则保持一致方面的有效性.
- 可能需要进一步努力,以完全标准化气球驱逐测试的各个方面.
更多相关视频
08:40Isokinetic Robotic Device to Improve Test-Retest and Inter-Rater Reliability for Stretch Reflex Measurements in Stroke Patients with Spasticity
Published on: June 12, 2019
7.4K
07:41Quantification of Levator Ani Hiatus Enlargement by Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Males and Females with Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Published on: April 17, 2019
9.3K
相关概念视频
01:25Assessment of the Rectum and Anus
115
Evaluating the rectum and anus plays a crucial role in conducting a thorough physical examination of the gastrointestinal system. Although it may be uncomfortable and often embarrassing for the patient, it holds immense diagnostic value, particularly in detecting gastrointestinal diseases and abnormalities. This guide will explain how to perform this assessment using inspection and palpation methods.
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...
115
01:28Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
691
When assessing blood pressure (BP), healthcare professionals must consider various factors and potential unexpected outcomes to ensure accurate readings and provide proper patient care. Adhering to these guidelines is essential to achieving the most reliable results.
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
691