随机对照试验的元分析,检查社会比较作为行为科学中的行为改变技术
Thole H Hoppen1, Rieke M Cuno2, Janna Nelson2
1Institute of Psychology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany. thoppen@uni-muenster.de.
Nature human behaviour
|May 19, 2025
概括
社会比较行为改变技术 (SC-BCT) 对健康和气候行动等行为产生了小但显著的影响. 这些技术具有成本效益和可扩展性,尽管需要更多高质量的研究.
科学领域:
- 行为科学 行为科学
- 心理学 心理学 心理学
- 公共卫生 公共卫生
背景情况:
- 社会比较是一种广泛研究的行为改变技术.
- 之前的研究表明潜在的有效性,但缺乏全面的综合.
研究的目的:
- 对社会比较行为改变技术 (SC-BCT) 的随机对照试验进行元分析.
- 评估SC-BCTs在各种行为领域的短期和长期有效性.
主要方法:
- 79个随机对照试验的随机效应元分析 (N=1,356,521).
- 搜索了MEDLINE,PsycINFO和Web of Science数据库,从开始到2024年1月.
- 分析了与气候变化减缓,健康,绩效和服务相关的行为影响.
主要成果:
- 与被动和主动对照相比,SC-BCT在短期 (平均3.7个月) 和长期 (平均6.2个月) 中产生了小而显著的效果.
- 更多的SC-BCT会话,并专注于与更大的效果相关的期望行为.
- 证据确定性范围从低到中等;建议进行进一步的研究.
结论:
- SC-BCT是一种具有成本效益和可扩展的行为改变干预措施.
- 尽管效果大小小小,但它们的低成本证明了它们的使用是合理的.
- 需要高质量的研究来进一步阐明缓解效应,并优化SC-BCT的实施.
相关概念视频
Social Proof
27.3K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.3K
Behavior Modification
115
Behavioral approaches have often been criticized for ignoring mental processes and focusing solely on observable behavior. However, these approaches provide an optimistic perspective for individuals seeking to change their behaviors. Rather than concentrating on intrinsic personality traits, behavioral approaches suggest that even longstanding habits can be modified by changing the reward contingencies that maintain them.
A real-world application of operant conditioning principles is applied...
A real-world application of operant conditioning principles is applied...
115
Persuasion Strategies
38.2K
Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
38.2K
Statistical Significance
19.9K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
19.9K
Regression Toward the Mean
6.3K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.3K
Social Facilitation
31.6K
Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
31.6K


