核心级别6:在发现表的总结中提出证据
Gordon Guyatt1,2,3, Liang Yao4, M Hassan Murad5
1Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada guyatt@mcmaster.ca.
概括
这篇文章详细介绍了核心GRADE方法的总结结果表,这对于理解干预效应和证据确定性至关重要. 这些表格呈现了相对和绝对效应,有助于临床决策对患者的结果.
科学领域:
- 临床证据综合研究
- 卫生技术评估 卫生技术评估
- 基于证据的医学基于证据的医学.
背景情况:
- 结论摘要 (SoF) 表对于展示干预效应的证据至关重要.
- 建议评估,开发和评价 (GRADE) 方法的分级为评估证据质量提供了一个框架.
- 准确地解释干预效应需要明确地阐述绝对和相对风险以及证据的确定性.
研究的目的:
- 介绍核心GRADE方法,用于构建结论表的总结.
- 为二进制和连续结果概述展示绝对和相对效应的方法.
- 提高患者重要结果的证据的清晰度和可解释性.
主要方法:
- 描述核心GRADE方法,用于开发结论表的摘要.
- 解释使用对二元结果的基线风险计算绝对效应的计算.
- 应对呈现连续结果的挑战,包括不同的测量仪器和最小重要的差异.
主要成果:
- 结果表的摘要提供了干预效应的基本信息,包括相对和绝对效应以及证据的确定性.
- 对于二进制结果,使用相对风险估计和代表性基线风险来计算绝对效应.
- 结论表总结中的单独行包含不同的基线风险,单位和最小重要的差异的细节有助于持续的结果解释.
结论:
- 核心GRADE方法有助于创建信息总结的调查结果表.
- 这些表格提高了对干预效应的理解,并提高了对患者结果的证据确定性.
- 清晰地呈现绝对效应和结果测量细节,提高了证据在临床实践中的适用性.
相关概念视频
The Evidence for Evolution
47.6K
Genetic variations accumulating within populations over generations give rise to biological evolution. Evolutionary changes can result in the formation of novel varieties and entire new species. These changes are responsible for the diverse forms of life inhabiting the planet. The evidence for evolution suggests that all living organisms descended from common ancestors.
47.6K
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
3.7K
When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
3.7K
Methods of Documentation IV: Focus Charting
1.7K
Focus Charting, also known as the focus charting system or "focus documentation," is a systematic documentation approach used in healthcare to organize patient information in medical records.
It typically involves three columns for recording information:
It typically involves three columns for recording information:
1.7K
Statistical Analysis: Overview
15.0K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
15.0K
Significance Testing: Overview
11.5K
Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...
11.5K
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test
5.0K
The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...
5.0K


